Chief information commissioner and department of personnel & training should look into the matter and withdraw absurd rules under which genuine queries are sent back, says Delhi RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal
Jasleen Kaur | May 24, 2013
Delhi-based RTI activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal has criticised the central information commission (CIC) for sending back an RTI petition filed by him on a flimsy ground – that it was not legible and readable, among other.
The CIC, which found alleged discrepancy in the petition as per rule 8 of the right to information rules-2012, marked three out of eight reasons for returning the petition, dated May 2013.
The other two reasons for which it was returned were that the petition was not filed as per the format decided by authorities and indexing of documents was not done as per the required format.
Another petition, received by the commission in November 2012, filed by Agrawal, was also called incomplete as per rule 8 of the Right to information rules. It was returned because Index was not enclosed and that each page of the document was not self attested.
Agrawal said the chief information commissioner should look into the documents to decide whether the returned petition and documents were readable or not. “Action should be taken against the CIC staffer (responsible for returning it) in case the commissioner finds the documents legible and readable,” Agrawal said. “How can a petitioner who does not know how to draw tables be expected to submit petitions and index (it) only in format decided by the authorities?”
Other reasons for returning the petition in the past include not enclosing copies of RTI petitions, appeal and/or orders etc.
Agrawal said a unique case was decided by the commission where a copy of RTI petition could not be practically filed because the central public information officer’s “vague response” did not carry any reference or subject-matter, or any other such aspect which could be related with any RTI petitions filed by the petitioner. Also, another registry of a commissioner returned the petition because suddenly it required photocopies of documents attested, even though an affidavit was submitted with the petition for contents of petition being true, he said.
According to Agrawal, a user-friendly act should be adopted without requiring the assistance of lawyers. “The chief information commissioner and the department of personnel & training (DoPT) should look into the matter and withdraw such absurd rules. It is grossly misused by registries of some of the information commissioners,” he said.
With the outbreak of Coronavirus reported from China, India has started taking precautionary measures, and begun screening passengers of selected flights. “As of 21st January, a total of 43 flights and 9156 passengers have been screened for novel Coronavirus illness. Till now, no case
Every middle-class Indian dreams of a home coupled withlanded property to live off the rent. However, large initial investment, particularly inmetros, and low yields ensure that real estate is out of the reach of the common man. A return of 7-8 percent from commercial properties is considered highly commen
The Maharashtra State Election Commission has urged the residents to take advantage of the ongoing Electors Verification Programme (EVP) and register their names along with those of the members of their families in the electoral rolls. The drive, which started on November 11, 2019, will continue till Febru
The budget season is here, and the annual document has gone to print, beginning the lock-in period till its presentation in parliament on February 1. The Halwa ceremony, marking the commencement of the budget printing process, was held in North Block Monday morning in the presence of finance
Investment banker, venture capitalist and stock-market expert Vallabh Bhansali is the co-founder and chairman of Enam Group, a pioneering equity research company in the country. He is a promoter of spiritual and cultural traditions and also an expert on development economics, behavioural science and co
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) projects are always under scrutiny, given the options of alternative of traditional procurement for the government. The value-for-money debate is one of the essential parameters to judge any PPP. In the absence of any credible data on this regard, it is very difficult to e