TRAI seeks opinion on having ombudsman for telecom sector

Consultation paper floated with a view to resolve complaints as telecom subscribers in India reach 1.04 billion

GN Bureau | July 28, 2016


#consultation paper   #ombudsman   #TRAI   #telecom subscribers  


 “Should a separate, independent and appropriately empowered structure to resolve telecom sector complaints and grievance be established?” asked Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) in its latest consultation paper floated on Thursday.

According to TRAI, number of telecom subscribers in the country has reached around 1.04 billion by June 2016. Number of complaints the subscribers had filed during the period of January to March 2016 is approximately 10.23 million, it added.
 
Noting that the regulator doesn’t have power to take individual complaints, and questioning the current complaint redressal mechanism, TRAI sought public view on whether the telecom industry needs an independent body or an ombudsman, having legal powers, to whom consumers can bring their grievances.
 
TRAI says, “Their (ombudsman) decisions are binding on the service providers. They have the powers to award compensation. They step in when consumers exhaust the complaint redressal procedure of the service providers. They prefer to play the role of a mediator and strive to find an amicable settlement between the consumer and the provider. An award following the due process is passed only when such conciliatory efforts fail.”
 
Currently banking and insurance sectors of India are having ombudsmen.
 
The last date to submit comments is on August 18 and counter-comments can be submitted by August 26.
 
Questions raised by TRAI in its consultation papers are:
Q1: Is the complaint redressal mechanism, as presently existing, adequate or is there a need to strengthen it?
Q2: Are there any specific changes that can be made to the existing system to improve it?
Q3: Should a separate - independent and appropriately empowered - structure to resolve telecom sector complaints and grievances be established?
Q4: If yes, please comment with regard to the organization; its structure; kinds of complaints to be handled and its powers?
Q5: Is establishing an Office of Telecom Ombudsman an option that should be revisited, especially given the experience of the past few years of increasing numbers of complaints?
 
Q6: If yes, how should it be created – the legal framework? What should be its structure? How should it be funded? What types of complaints should it handle? What should be its powers, functions, duties and responsibilities?
 

Comments

 

Other News

The women India doesn`t count enough

She runs a tailoring shop from a single room in her house. Every morning she stitches school uniforms, answers queries on WhatsApp, collects payments through UPI and orders fabric online. Officially, she still belongs to India`s informal economy. Yet her enterprise is no longer disconnected from the formal

“Cancer is just a mind game”

Dr. Ananda Shankar Jayant, a Padma Shri awardee, inspired audiences for decades through her mastery of Bharatanatyam and Kuchipudi. But it was her journey through cancer that taught some of life`s most powerful lessons in courage and resilience.

Why Swami Vivekananda is the pathfinder for our times

Swami Vivekananda for Our Times  Edited and compiled by Rajiv Sikri, with Introduction by S. Gurumurthy Rupa Publications, 552 pages, Rs 695  

Five ways to realise the potential of India’s handicraft and handloom sector

India`s economic ambitions are increasingly defined by the industries of the future. Semiconductors, electronics, artificial intelligence and advanced manufacturing dominate policy conversations. Yet one of India`s largest employment-intensive sectors continues to occupy a surprisingly marginal place in ec

Beyond toilets: Why open defecation persists in rural India

Despite the awareness campaigns on sanitation across India, open defecation (OD) is practised openly and widely in both rural and urban areas. Research shows that rural respondents are well aware of the negative impacts of OD, yet this awareness does not lead to toilet construction or use. In rural North I

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter