UN puts NHRC, Balakrishnan under scanner

The global body had questioned 'selection procedure' way back in January

trithesh

Trithesh Nandan | May 23, 2011



The UN is going to take a call on renewing the accreditation of India's national human rights commission (NHRC) on Monday and a media report says out human rights body may face a downgrade.

However, as Governance Now reported in January, the UN was casting aspersions on the NHRC for quite a while -- in particular, thanks to the allegations against its current chief and former chief justice of India, KG Balakrishnan. Here is the updated report:

In January, the UN surprised many when it questioned the selection of the mebers of the NHRC, where the position of the chairperson is reserved for a former chief justice of the supreme court. The UN has also questioned the selection of other members of the team as well.

“The selection procedure, restricting clause of selecting Chief Justice of the Supreme Court as NHRC chairperson should be broadened,” Margaret Sekaggya, UN Special Rapporteur told reporters in New Delhi in January. "The functioning of the National Human Rights Commission should be reviewed with a view to strengthening the Commission by, inter alia: extending the one-year limitation clause; establishing an independent committee in charge of investigating complaints filed; elevating the status of the human rights defenders focal point by appointing a Commissioner," she said in her preliminary recommendations.

Sekaggya also criticised the way NHRC functions. “The human rights defenders have submitted complaints related to human rights violations to the commissions, but reportedly their cases were hardly taken up, or the investigation, often after a significant period of delay, concluded that no violations occurred,” she said at the presentation of her preliminary report on India after her 10-day visit to the country.

Sekaggya put forth the question, “Can we broadened the selection of NHRC members and chairperson and bring more diversity in it? Functioning of human rights commission must be reviewed.”

However, she did not single out the NHRC chairperson during the press conference. "I am aware of the certain charges leveled against his relatives in media reports," Sekaggya told Governance Now after the press conference.

Sekaggya was also keeping tabs on human rights activist and paediatrician Dr. Binayak Sen's incarceration ovr alleged sedition. “We are looking waiting the outcome. We are looking at how court comes with judgement,” She told reporters. Sekaggya also met Dr. Sen’s wife Prof. Illina Sen during her visit to India. Dr Sen has been released on bail since then.

Talking about allegations of human rights violation in Jammu and Kashmir, the UN official also said that the government must address the issues of the people of the state. “During my Kashmir visit, I listened to the testimony from the families from where their relatives died,” she said.

She also asked India to repeal the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSA) and the Public Safety Act.

Sekaggya also criticised the Maoists violence. “Non-state actors commit violence too. Protection mechanism of the people of the country must be strengthened.”

“The state should put a mechanism in place so that the RTI activists are not targeted,” she said in the press conference. At least ten RTI activists have been killed while raising poor governance issue around the country.

Her preliminary report is based on touring New Delhi, Bhubaneshwar (Orissa), Kolkata (West Bengal), Guwahati (Assam), Ahmedabad (Gujarat), Jammu and Srinagar (Jammu and Kashmir) and submit the report to UN Human Rights Council (UNHCR).

Sekaggya’s visit was the first by any UN special rapporteur to India. Previous requests to visit India in 2002, 2003 and 2004 were not entertained by the government. However, the government allowed her a ten-day to visit while she applied for a three-week one. “In ten-days you can’t cover such a huge country,” she said.

“India is a party to international commitment and law, so the basic question is how to improve situation of human rights of the country,” Sekaggya told reporters.

On her visit to India, Sekaggya met people from all sides – government officials to human right defenders.

Comments

 

Other News

Indian Ocean more contested than ever: Western Naval Command Chief

The Indian Ocean is becoming increasingly contested and strategically significant as the Indo-Pacific emerges as the defining geopolitical theatre of the 21st century, Vice Admiral Krishna Swaminathan, Flag Officer Commanding-in-Chief of the Western Naval Command, has said.   Spe

Why the judiciary needs much more than four more judges

India has a particular form of governance theatre: the bold declaration that appears to be action but is actually a way of avoiding action. The Union Cabinet on May 5 approved a Bill to increase the sanctioned strength of the Supreme Court from 34 to 38. The decision has been touted as a step toward judici

Wisdom stories that don’t preach but encourage reflection

The Foundation Of A Fulfilling Life: Lessons from Indian Scriptures Deepam Chatterjee Aleph Books, 264 pages, Rs 899  

Citizens of the Bay: Why BIMSTEC matters now

The international order is drifting into a dangerous grey zone as the very powers that built today`s multilateral system begin to chip away at it. The United States has increasingly walked away from global rules and forums when they no longer suit its interests, while China has rushed to fill the vacuum on

PM salutes armed forces on one year of Operation Sindoor

Prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday saluted the courage, precision and resolve of the armed forces on the completion of one year of Operation Sindoor.   The PM said that the armed forces had given a fitting response to those who dared to attack innocent Indians at Pahalgam.&

Supreme Court judge strength to go up by four to 37

The strength of the Supreme Court is set to go up from 33 judges to 37 judges, paving the way for a more efficient and speedier justice. The Union Cabinet on Tuesday approved the proposal for introducing The Supreme Court (Number of Judges) Amendment Bill, 2026 in Parliament to amend The Sup


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter