UPA had said ‘no’ to surgical strikes after 26/11 -Governance Now

UPA had said ‘no’ to surgical strikes after 26/11

The coalition UPA government headed by Manmohan Singh was not ready to risk escalation of tensions with Pakistan

Aasha Khosa | September 29, 2016 | New Delhi

#Pakistan #Manmohan Singh #UPA #surgical strikes #Mumbai attack #NIA #Pakistan

The idea of punishing Pakistan for sending terrorists to strike at targets in India was mulled during the UPA rule after 10 terrorists of Lashkar-e-Toiba had attacked multiple locations in Mumbai on September 26 in 2008.

A surgical strike on Jamat-ul-dawah – a seminary cum terrorist recruitment center run by the Lashkar head and cleric close to Pakistan army Hafiz Saeed at Muridke near Lahore - would have been an appropriate response to the three-day blood bath carried out by terrorists leaving over 160, including nationals of five countries, dead and 308 wounded. Due to the enormity of the crime perpetrated by terrorists, who were Pakistani citizens, India would have received a huge global support.

But the surgical strike didn’t happen, for the coalition government of UPA headed by Manmohan Singh was not ready to risk escalation of tensions with Pakistan. Instead of knocking the Muridke township off the map, the UPA government had then chosen to augment country’s defenses against such terrorist strikes. The National Investigating Agency had emerged out of this decision.

READ: Meanwhile on Twitter, Indians and Pakistanis go to war

So, it’s for the first time that India’s elite Special Forces have crossed the line of control, the 800 km de facto border, that was the ceasefire line ordered by the United Nations security council between the two nations after Pakistan had attacked India with the intention of grabbing Kashmir, barely a year after the partition.

A surgical strike is not a conventional warfare but a limited offensive aimed at destroying targets which are inimical to the security of the country undertaking it. So, Pakistan can’t take the four-hour strike as India’s war cry and escalate tension in the region.

Pakistan’s denial of the operation is along the expected lines, as it has never owned up terrorists, or their presence in the border outposts along the LoC, which are launch pads of terrorists headed to Kashmir. Remember, Pakistan has not even accepted that Ajmal Kasab, who had to hang for Mumbai attack in Yerwada jail in 2012, as its national. How would the army and Nawaz Sharif government, which is facing shame of countries boycotting SAARC meet in Islamabad, would accept that Indian army had indeed attacked terrorist camps-cum-border outposts of Pakistan army?

Comments

Other News

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.

From pyramid to platform: BRICS agenda for Global South

In his opening address at the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12, prime minister Narendra Modi did something India`s diplomacy has been building towards for three years: he moved the ‘Voice of the Global South’ from a slogan to a work plan. Addressing the leaders, he argued that t

How to realise the full transformative potential of PM-JAY

The Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), a welfare scheme which covers approximately 45 crore beneficiaries across India, provides cashless health cover of Rs. 5 lakh per family per year. It is the largest health insurance scheme which helped crores of poor families by reducing out-of-pocket expend

The missing men in India`s family planning story

Every pregnancy requires two people. Yet India`s family planning programme continues to ask only one of them to bear almost all of its medical consequences. The newly released National Family Health Survey-6 (2023-24) confirms just how entrenched this asymmetry remains: 36.5% of currently married women a

`Development must be judged beyond GDP, with rights and justice at core`

Delivering the IXth Chief Justice M.C. Chagla Memorial Lecture on ‘Human Rights and Sustainable Development Goals’, in Mumbai Friday, former Chief Justice of India Bhushan R. Gavai questioned whether conventional economic indicators such as gross domestic product (GDP), national income,