We have money to save the world, not feed our own hungry millions

Manmohan's $10 bn pledge to Eurozone and why we shouldn't feel great about it

bvrao

BV Rao | June 21, 2012


Prime minister Manmohan Singh on his arrival at Air Force Base Galeao at Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
Prime minister Manmohan Singh on his arrival at Air Force Base Galeao at Rio De Janeiro, Brazil

At the G20 meet on Tuesday, prime minister Manmohan Singh pledged $10 billion for bailing out crisis-hit Eurozone.

From being a regular seeker of loans and grants from the developed countries, we have now reached a stage where our prime minister can write a cheque for $10 billion in one stroke, on the face of it an admittedly small price to pay for an aspiring superpower. 

As Indians, that must make our chests swell in pride. It’s good that we have excess cash that we can give away with such flourish. But before we pat ourselves on the back, here’s a grim reality check.

At around the time that Manmohan made the announcement in Mexico, his number two in the cabinet, Pranab Mukherjee, was holding perhaps his last EGoM (empowered group of ministers) to decide on another kind of excess: too much food grains.

Not for the first time in this decade, India’s food production and food procurement have broken records. As a result there is nearly 82 million tonnes (MT) of food grain with the Food Corporation of India (FCI) which does not know where to keep it. FCI has covered food grains storage capacity of just 63 MT. That is to say that nearly 19 MT are right now lying in the open.

The Rangarajan committee recommended to the government that 13 MT should be released to the poor through PDS (10 MT) and the open market (3 MT). That was expecting too much generosity of the government because back in 2010 when a similar situation obtained, the government preferred to let the excess food grains rot in the open than give it away free to the poor. It did not even heed an order of the supreme court because, it said, to distribute the grains free it would cost the government Rs 5,000 crore. A cost the country could ill-afford.

The government buys wheat at about Rs 12.85 from farmers. Storage, transportation and other costs add another Rs 5.35, taking it to Rs 18.20 per kg. But at the PDS outlets, it sells wheat at an average of Rs 5 per kg. Hence for every kilogram of wheat sold, the government loses about Rs 13 (very rough, back of envelope calculations). This is what is referred to as subsidy. Similarly for rice and other food grains which would take the total subsidy for releasing 13 MT to about Rs 17,000 crore.

But, excess food grain, you see, is not as easy to give away as spare cash. It is cheaper for the government and better for the economy to let the food grains rot than feed the hungry.

The Pranab Mukherjee EGoM was meeting to take a final call on this excess headache. It decided to pare down Rangarajan’s recommendation for release of 13 MT to just 8 MT to bring the subsidy burden down from Rs 17,000 crore to Rs 10,000 crore only, a saving of Rs 7,000 crore.
Back to Manmohan and his Mexico munificence. He gave away $10 billion, that is Rs 56,000 crore, in the blink of an eye. That is, he wrote off eight times more money to save the world than his finance minister saved by snatching away 5 MT of food from the plates of hungry Indians.

This place at the world’s high table sure costs a lot, a few million empty stomachs here in India. Suddenly, I’m not feeling so good about this superpower act. Are you?

PS: Of course, technically speaking, India has only pledged the money. It will be released only when badly needed. May be it won’t be needed at all. But that does not take anything away from the fact that while we are willing to give Rs 56,000 to the world, we are cutting corners when it comes to feeding our hungry millions.

 

Comments

 

Other News

How social media is reshaping elections

Since Brazil’s return to direct presidential elections in 1985, no candidate who finished second in the first round of polling had ever won the presidency. Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, now 81, has just done it. What explains the comeback, and what changed in Brazilian politics to make it possi

Cabinet approves Dearness Allowance, Dearness Relief

The union cabinet chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday approved the release of an additional instalment of Dearness Allowance (DA) to central government employees and Dearness Relief (DR) to pensioners with effect from 01.07.2026 representing an increase of 3% over the existing rates of 6

Cyclone Arnab strikes Andhra as warming oceans amplify storm risks

Cyclone Arnab made landfall along the Andhra Pradesh and Yanam coasts in the early hours of Wednesday as a very severe cyclonic storm, with maximum sustained wind speeds of 125–135 kmph and gusts reaching 150 kmph. Its rapid intensification has raised concerns about how warmer oceans, global warmin

Counting matters but which ones?

The first instinct of public policy is to count. Its harder task is to count what counts. We have become remarkably good at measuring the reach of the welfare state vis-à-vis beneficiaries covered, rupees transferred, houses built, connections installed and services delivered. But some of the most

Inching closer to a trade deal with America

The cooperation between India and the United States goes back quite a time. We need to relegate that era to the backburner when Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru visited US in the times of president Dwight Eisenhower and called the American let-off of 10 million dollars in defence aid to Pakistan as a “gun w

Manch vs Musk: Forty people and a foreign billionaire

About forty people walked the roundabout on Teen Murti Marg to the gate of Chanakyapuri police station, a distance you could cover in under a minute, on Friday to protest against Elon Musk’s Starlink. The walk was called by the Swadeshi Jagaran Manch. Nobody joined them on the way, and nobody seeme

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter