When a minister has not met his speech, it's a big deal, Mr Krishna

Our foreign minister's embarrassing gaffe at the UN is not a matter of mirth

bikram

Bikram Vohra | February 13, 2011




Foreign Minister S M Krishna’s gaffe at the UN  General Assembly in reading the Portuguese Minister’s speech borders on the absurd and underscores three distinct facets.
That these ministers do not do their homework.
That in their conceit they do not even care that they have not done their homework.
That they are entirely disconnected from their portfolios and only enjoy the perks, otherwise something like this could never happen.
The fourth element is the most frightening. These elected leaders don’t even care that they don’t care. Consequently, having made a complete fool of himself in an international forum and being so self absorbed in his sense of importance he now defends himself by saying it is no big deal. Even if you were talking to the Rotary Club or the Lions it would be a big deal, Sir. When you are addressing an international forum and you are a senior representative of the country’s foreign policy you should have studied each word, each sentiment, each expression of intent. It is a big deal, a very big deal. This is a nation wanting a seat on the Security Council.
What is most awesomely dismaying about the whole episode is that it has been confined to the stream of light humour rather than the indictment it is. It is not so much in the human error of picking up the wrong copy of a speech which can happen to anyone that Mr Krishna deserves censure but in the fact that he did not for 180 seconds register it was not his speech. Like strangers in the night or ships that pass by or two ends that never meet, the foreign minister and his speech had never met. Just try talking for 180 seconds in front of a mirror and see how long that time is in terms of speaking. You go through over a 1000 to 1500 words of intent.
The other very scary part is that there are no consequences to embarrassing a nation in public. Neither Mr Krishnan nor his entourage nor those responsible for connecting him to his speech will receive more than a slap on the wrist. It just goes to show that in a nation where making speeches is a sport at which it excels, its practitioners in politics are now so above it all that they emit only white noise and expect to get away with it.
In a more perfect world Mr Krishna would have been called upon to explain how this incident occurred and responsibility for the bureaucratic bungling be placed at someone’s door.
Which in no way reduces the incumbent’s unconscionable indifference to his job.

 

Comments

 

Other News

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  

In Varanasi, fringe expansion vs. core heritage

For centuries, the urban framework of Varanasi was defined not just by its relationship with the sacred Ganga but by its multifaceted network of urban commons. Historic kunds, seasonal talabs (ponds), and open maidans served as the city’s basic ecological infrastructure. Th





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter