When a minister has not met his speech, it's a big deal, Mr Krishna

Our foreign minister's embarrassing gaffe at the UN is not a matter of mirth

bikram

Bikram Vohra | February 13, 2011




Foreign Minister S M Krishna’s gaffe at the UN  General Assembly in reading the Portuguese Minister’s speech borders on the absurd and underscores three distinct facets.
That these ministers do not do their homework.
That in their conceit they do not even care that they have not done their homework.
That they are entirely disconnected from their portfolios and only enjoy the perks, otherwise something like this could never happen.
The fourth element is the most frightening. These elected leaders don’t even care that they don’t care. Consequently, having made a complete fool of himself in an international forum and being so self absorbed in his sense of importance he now defends himself by saying it is no big deal. Even if you were talking to the Rotary Club or the Lions it would be a big deal, Sir. When you are addressing an international forum and you are a senior representative of the country’s foreign policy you should have studied each word, each sentiment, each expression of intent. It is a big deal, a very big deal. This is a nation wanting a seat on the Security Council.
What is most awesomely dismaying about the whole episode is that it has been confined to the stream of light humour rather than the indictment it is. It is not so much in the human error of picking up the wrong copy of a speech which can happen to anyone that Mr Krishna deserves censure but in the fact that he did not for 180 seconds register it was not his speech. Like strangers in the night or ships that pass by or two ends that never meet, the foreign minister and his speech had never met. Just try talking for 180 seconds in front of a mirror and see how long that time is in terms of speaking. You go through over a 1000 to 1500 words of intent.
The other very scary part is that there are no consequences to embarrassing a nation in public. Neither Mr Krishnan nor his entourage nor those responsible for connecting him to his speech will receive more than a slap on the wrist. It just goes to show that in a nation where making speeches is a sport at which it excels, its practitioners in politics are now so above it all that they emit only white noise and expect to get away with it.
In a more perfect world Mr Krishna would have been called upon to explain how this incident occurred and responsibility for the bureaucratic bungling be placed at someone’s door.
Which in no way reduces the incumbent’s unconscionable indifference to his job.

 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter