Deviously defined democracy

UPA thinks that banning protests at Jantar Mantar will muffle disaffected citizens

sarthak

Sarthak Ray | August 9, 2011



You can’t grab protest realty. That is UPA’s holier-than-thou rejoinder to Team Hazare’s request for permission for a month-long protest in support of the Jan Lokpal bill at Jantar Mantar. Delhi Police, in its letter to the protesters, said that no single organisation can be allowed to usurp and lay exclusive claim to the top protest hub.

Now, there may be as many issues needing demonstrations as there are Indians, but nothing seems more pressing than the aam aadmi’s frustration with corruption. When the squeeze is so total, it is only rational that the need for space for outcry has to be commensurate. So, is it unfair of Team Anna to have asked for Jantar Mantar for a month?

As a government representative on the joint drafting committee, Kapil Sibal had, more than once, called Team Hazare “unelected executives”. One can only hope that the referendum in which 85 percent of almost 1.5 lakh people of his Lok Sabha constituency, Chandni Chowk, overwhelmingly ‘voted’ in favour of the Jan Lokpal broadened his idea of democracy to something beyond electoral victories. “Unelected executives”, by the way, was a phrase commonly passed on to scribes by Congress spokespersons at press briefings on Lokpal when the joint drafting committee was at work.

The government’s democratisation spin smacks of intolerance for a dissenting note, in this case, for a stronger Lokpal bill than its own draft. The government fears the crowd of disaffected citizens will get thicker and louder than the one that assembled in April. But UPA’s salvation does not lie in banning the protest. In fact, the move betrays a crisis of confidence within the government. If the government thought its Lokpal draft was the sabre-tooth needed to check corruption, it would have let hecklers do their bit and leave. It, however, is consciously shutting out citizens’ cry for effective measures against corruption.

Here is a popularly elected government, happily democratic in ensuring equitable access to a whining podium for all, but stolidly autocratic about what it will listen to.

The ban will do little to daunt the protesters.  In fact, some burnt copies of the government’s draft even as it was being tabled in parliament.  As for Anna Hazare and his supporters, they have many venues to choose from even if Jantar Mantar is closed to them.

What is worrying is that the government feels neither the need nor the inclination to respond to the protesters with the wile of politics, or even with a debate. Instead, it is trying to muscle them into silence using state instruments. What can be farther from whatever notions of democracy the commons hold?


 

Comments

 

Other News

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  

In Varanasi, fringe expansion vs. core heritage

For centuries, the urban framework of Varanasi was defined not just by its relationship with the sacred Ganga but by its multifaceted network of urban commons. Historic kunds, seasonal talabs (ponds), and open maidans served as the city’s basic ecological infrastructure. Th

What ails India`s skill development ecosystem

India’s skill development programmes were designed with a goal to make the young population ready with market-required skills and competencies, and to provide them with better employment opportunities. Yet the outcomes have fallen short of that goal: though over 1.6 crore individuals were trained acr





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter