Disclosures to discoverability: The evolution of ‘Country of Origin’ filter in Indian e-comm

The mandatory filter is an important step toward greater marketplace transparency and informed consumer choice. However, its long-term success will depend on ensuring that transparency remains neutral

Gangesh Varma and Srija Naskar | March 17, 2026


#E-commerce  
(Illustration: Ashish Asthana)
(Illustration: Ashish Asthana)

The Ministry of Consumer Affairs’ recent notification tightening rules for online retail by mandating searchable, sortable “country of origin” filters for packaged commodities sold on e-commerce platforms is a small but significant nudge toward a fairer digital marketplace. The amendment to the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 (“LMPC Rules”) makes it easier for consumers to find and favor Indian-made products while boosting transparency and compliance across platforms. 

 
One of the primary objectives of this amendment is to create a level-playing field for Indian manufacturers. By mandating that e-commerce platforms provide a searchable, sortable “country of origin” filter, the amendment enhances the visibility of domestic products alongside imported goods. This visible “Made in India” filter not only shortens product discovery time and boosts domestic sellers’ presence, but also empowers consumers who prefer locally produced options, supporting the government’s Atmanirbhar agenda. 
 
The Regulatory Road
The regulatory journey of the "country of origin" requirement on Indian e-commerce platforms has evolved significantly from a passive disclosure mandate to a proactive mechanism for consumer empowerment. The cornerstone of the “country of origin” mandate lies in Rule 6 of the LMPC Rules which requires imported products to display name of the country of origin or manufacture or assembly on their packaging. In 2017, this obligation was extended to e-commerce platforms, compelling them to ensure disclosure of such information on digital networks. Despite these explicit requirements, implementation and compliance have often remained inconsistent, with origin details buried in product descriptions or displayed non-uniformly across platforms. 
 
Driven by consumer protection considerations, and the government's Atmanirbhar Bharat vision, regulatory attention increasingly focused on strengthening enforcement of origin disclosures in online marketplaces. The Government e-Marketplace (“GeM”) operationalized stricter origin declaration requirements for product listings and introduced a “Make in India” filter for goods with at least 50% local origin reflecting a shift toward structured digital transparency tools.
 
Organizations like the Confederation of All India Traders (“CAIT”) advocated for the expansion and strict enforcement of origin disclosure requirements across retail channels. In parallel, the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (“DPIIT”) engaged with leading e-commerce platforms regarding implementation challenges, while the central government reiterated that existing legal frameworks already required such disclosures. The notification of the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020, further formalized disclosure obligations applicable to online marketplaces. 
 
The recent amendment to the LMPC Rules builds on this trajectory by requiring e-commerce platforms to operationalize origin information through dedicated, searchable and sortable filters. In doing so, it transforms country-of-origin disclosure from a static labelling requirement into an integrated product discovery feature embedded within platform design. Mandating the “country of origin” filter represents a critical step toward safeguarding consumer and national interests. 
 
In an era where digital storefronts are flooded with options and origin details are often buried or obscure, centralizing this information empowers shoppers to make more informed, discerning choices. It not only streamlines product comparisons but also enhances market transparency. For regulators, this measure introduces a vital layer of accountability, simplifying the process of verifying claims and enforcing compliance with labeling standards. By making provenance readily accessible, the amendment reinforces trust and integrity in the online marketplace.
 
Challenges Remain
While the mandatory searchable and sortable “country of origin” filter marks a significant advancement for transparency and domestic industry, certain implementation challenges persist even after the transition from mere disclosure to active discoverability. Platforms must now grapple with operationalizing these filters at scale while ensuring consistency in user experience. Several concerns remain such as ensuring sellers furnish accurate and verifiable origin information rather than superficial compliance or establishing standardized guidelines for products with mixed, composite, or bundled origins. Further, navigating the changing Proof of Origin or certification frameworks and the potential friction with international trade obligations and WTO commitments; and supporting small exporters and MSMEs in adapting their cataloguing processes to meet the enhanced technical requirements will continue to remain challenging. Addressing these issues with clarity will be essential to ensure that the amendment delivers meaningful benefits to consumers and Indian businesses alike. 
 
Enabling Effective Change
With the searchable and sortable “country of origin” filter now enshrined in law, focus must shift from policy design to effective implementation and enabling sustained compliance. Both the government and e-commerce platforms will need to adopt a pragmatic approach to operationalizing this requirement. Regulatory authorities should issue clear technical guidelines and interpretive clarifications, particularly for products with multi-jurisdictional origins to ensure uniform application across platforms. Compliance support mechanisms, including capacity-building initiatives and simplified cataloguing tools should be extended to start-ups, small businesses and MSMEs to ease their transition. Further to foster consumer understanding and provide an enabling environment for compliance, a public-facing explainer should be developed to clarify how mixed-origin labelling works. Finally, none of these efforts will be effective without robust monitoring and periodic audits that will ensure that the law’s objectives translate into meaningful, on-ground outcomes. 
 
In conclusion, the mandatory “country-of-origin” filter represents an important step toward greater marketplace transparency and informed consumer choice. However, its long-term success will depend on ensuring that transparency remains neutral. Empowering consumers without unintentionally burdening sellers, especially small businesses and MSMEs. The regulatory goal should not be to veer into protectionism, but rather to foster a balanced digital marketplace where domestic and global players compete fairly, and consumers are empowered through clarity, not constrained by bias. 
 
Gangesh Varma is Principal Associate, and Srija Naskar is Associate, at Saraf and Partners. 
 

Comments

 

Other News

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.”   No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter