A story of three stonewalled RTI pleas shows thorough lack of transparency on the mammoth exercise
Venkatesh Nayak | February 7, 2017 | New Delhi
The demonetisation of currency notes of Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 denomination that the government announced on November 8, 2016 and the subsequent remonetisation of the economy has affected almost every person in India. It came as a revelation when the media reported that many people in neighbouring Nepal were also adversely affected by the demonetisation of the high value currency notes when they sent a delegation to India to mitigate the note-ban crisis in January. So the Olympian DeMon-ReMon exercise affected billions of people within and across India's borders.
Despite the government spending taxpayers’ money to shore up public support for DeMon-ReMon exercise and the digitisation plan to move to a less-cash economy by linking it to ‘national pride’, detailed information about what went before and what followed this exercise is hard to come by. On the one hand movie and TV ‘celebrities’ (who probably never had to stand in a queue before banks or ATMs to change the demonetised notes they held) cheerfully urged people to support this exercise (perhaps they received payments in the new currency or through digital transactions). On the other hand, many of us in civil society and the mass media are knocking on the government’s doors for detailed information about this DeMon-ReMon exercise.
Here are three RTIs explaining how the bureaucracy is resisting the assurances of transparency that the prime minister and his colleagues have made time and again about the working of the NDA government. The first RTI story relates to the PMO and the remaining two relate to the Reserve Bank of India.
1) PMO has no information about PM's DeMon directive on ministers’ and BJP MPs’ bank transactions
On November 30, 2016, while addressing a meeting of the BJP’s parliamentary party, the prime minister reportedly asked his ministers and party MPs to submit details of their bank transactions between November 8 and December 31 to the president of the party. Several media reports opined that this directive was a move to buttress the PM’s commitment to transparency in public life, given the allegations made by the opposition parties that BJP leaders had advance information about the closely guarded DeMon-ReMon exercise.
Attaching a copy of the news report of the PM’s exhortation, Prof Jagdeep Chhokar, a founder trustee of the Association for Democratic Reforms (ADR), New Delhi, and I submitted a request for the following information under The Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) to the central public information officer (CPIO) of the prime minister’s office (PMO):
"1) A clear photocopy of the communication issued by the Hon’ble Prime Minister to all members of the Union Council of Ministers and MPs and MLAs of the Bharatiya Janata Party to submit declarations of their bank transactions between 08 November and 31 December, 2016;
2) A clear photocopy of any representation or petition received from any Union Minister or MP or MLA in relation to the communication specified at para #1 above;
3) A clear photocopy of all declarations received from the Union Ministers, MPs and MLAs till date regarding their bank transactions from 08 November 2016 till date; and
4) A clear photocopy of all communication issued by your office to the Income Tax Department or any other authority to inquire into any of the transactions contained in the declarations received from the Union Ministers, MPs and MLAs, till date, if any."
We submitted this request almost a month after the PM’s directive was reported in the media hoping that at least some ministers and MPs might have complied with this directive. Thanks to a judgment of the Punjab and Haryana high court, multiple citizens can seek information through a joint RTI application.
The CPIO has sent a reply saying that the PMO has no information about the matters raised in the aforementioned RTI application. (See here for the RTI application and reply)
It is not clear whether the PM’s directive to his ministers, BJP MPs and legislators remained merely verbal or was reduced to writing by anybody in the government. The directive assumes importance because it was made at the meeting of the BJP’s parliamentary party which comprises of all representatives elected by the people. Surely, the people have the right to know these details about their elected representatives.
Sceptics may argue that this is personal information and therefore private which deserves to be protected. However, there are at least two strong reasons why this argument does not hold water:
First, the voter’s right to know the assets and liabilities of candidates contesting elections to parliament and the state legislatures is a deemed fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, thanks to the successful litigation launched by ADR and PUCL. RTI is also a deemed fundamental right under this very article of the Constitution. So when people have the right to know details of the movable and immovable assets of politicians even before they get elected, surely, there is no reasonable basis for denying access to Demon-Remon transactions of Ministers, MPs and Legislators who are first and foremost people’s elected representatives. Asset declarations include bank balances reported by the candidates in their affidavits which are public disclosed on notice boards in the constituencies and on the website of the election commission.
So there is an overbearing public interest to know:
a) Whether the PM’s directive was sent to the ministers and party MLAs and MPs in writing;
b) Whether they have complied with it; and
c) Whether the income tax department is scrutinising their transactions with as much enthusiasm and promptness as it is doing with the transactions of other citizens.
Second, in November 2015, the attorney general of India argued before the supreme court that the citizens of India did not have a fundamental right to privacy guaranteed by the Constitution. The constitutional validity of Aadhaar was challenged through a PIL. The supreme court felt convinced enough by these arguments to refer the question whether citizens have a fundamental right to privacy to a Constitution Bench. It is not clear whether this bench has been constituted yet and whether this issue is likely to be decided any time soon. So when the elected representatives cannot stand up to protect people’s fundamental right to privacy they cannot stake a claim to protect their own privacy.
2) RBI has no information about how Bank Mitras helped the underprivileged cope with DeMon-ReMon
The second RTI application was about the assistance that Bank Mitras provided the underprivileged to deal with DeMon-ReMon woes. Three months after coming to power in 2014, the NDA government launched a massive financial inclusion programme called the Prime Minister’s Jan-Dhan Yojana (PMJDY). In order to provide banking services to the rural and urban poor at their doorstep, a scheme of ‘Bank Mitras’ was developed. Bank Mitras or Business Correspondents were tasked with ending what the PM called “financial untouchability” and the campaign was celebrated as a “festival to grant the poor independence from the vicious cycle of poverty”. According to media reports, about 22 crore PMJDY bank accounts have been opened till date. At the beginning of 2017, PMJDY bank accounts are said to have received more than Rs. 40,000 crore when the country was going through the DeMon drive.
One of the tasks of the Bank Mitras is to facilitate cash deposits and withdrawals for PMJDY beneficiaries. So in January 2017, I sought the following information under the RTI Act from the Reserve Bank of India about the role of Bank Mitras in helping underprivileged people cope with DeMon-ReMon:
"1) The State and district-wise number of Bank Mitras (Business Correspondent Agent) functioning under every commercial bank under your jurisdiction as on date;
2) The quantum of money deposited by Bank Mitras under every commercial bank in the accounts of beneficiaries of PM Jan Dhan Yojana since November 09, 2016 till date. Please provide bank-wise and district-wise details for each working day;
3) The quantum of money withdrawn by Bank Mitras under every commercial bank for the purpose of disbursing to PM Jan Dhan Yojana account holders since 09 November, 2016, till date. Please provide bank-wise and district-wise details for each working day;
4) The total number of pieces of currency notes of Rs. 500 and Rs. 2,000 denomination distributed by Bank Mitras in each district to PM Jan Dhan Yojana account holders since 09 November, 2016 till date, on account of facilitating withdrawal operations. Please provide bank-wise and district-wise details for each working day; and
5) The total number of pieces of currency notes of Rs. 100, Rs. 50, Rs. 20 and Rs. 10 denomination distributed by Bank Mitras in each district to PM Jan Dhan Yojana account holders since 09 November, 2016, till date, on account of facilitating withdrawal operations. Please provide bank-wise and district-wise details for each working day."
This RTI was sent directly to the Financial Inclusion and Development Department of RBI after checking the CPIO's details on the website. The CPIO, has replied stating that RBI does not have any of this information and has transferred the RTI application to the Department of Financial Services (DFS), Ministry of Finance. The CPIO of DFS is yet to respond to the RTI application transferred to him.
3) RBI will not reveal DeMon-Remon data from currency chests, keeps mum on data about attacks on banks
The third RTI application was about the amounts of currency sent to currency chests for the purpose of remonetisation every day after DeMon was announced. Soon after the DeMon-ReMon was launched, the media reported an open letter written by former BJP MLA and now Aam Aadmi Party leader, Yatin Oza, to the Hon'ble PM about some dubious financial transactions involving the demonetised notes that were allegedly going on in Gujarat. At the same time. week after week, people stood in long queues to deposit the demonetised currency notes and obtain the new notes. Media reports indicated that not enough pieces of currency notes were being circulated resulting in these long queues. Several media reports of attacks on banks and bank staff by irate customers across the country including Gujarat were also published. So I sought the following information under the RTI Act from the RBI to ascertain the actual position:
"Apropos of the Press Release of No. 2016-2017/1602 and dated 21 December, 2016, uploaded on your website, I would like to obtain the following detailed information under the RTI Act:
1) Please provide the complete list along with postal addresses of all designated currency chests across India, as on date;
2) Please provide day-wise details of currency notes of all denominations sent to all the designated currency chests across India since 09 November, 2016, till date; and
3) Please provide copies of all reports received from the officers responsible for the management of the designated currency chests across the country regarding the day-wise remittance of specified bank notes (SBN) from 09 November, till date, along with the name and address of the bank making each remittance.
I would also like to obtain the following additional information under the RTI Act from your public authority:
4) A clear photocopy of the report of every attack on the premises and staff of banks received by RBI from any source since 09 November, 2016, till date;
5) A clear photocopy of all official records, by whatever name called, indicating details of action taken by RBI on the basis of the reports specified at para #4 above; and
6) A clear photocopy of all official records, by whatever name called, indicating details of action taken by RBI to prevent the recurrence of attacks on the premises and staff of banks in future."
The CPIO of RBI has replied only to the first three queries.
1) The CPIO replied that I should look up the RBI website for the state-wise number and address of currency chests. (There are more than 3,600 currency chests across the country from which every bank picks up currency notes to distribute to its customers over the counter or through ATMs (see data compiled from the RBI's website). Rajasthan tops the list with 296 currency chests while Uttar Pradesh, the largest and most populous state has around 200.)
2) The CPIO, citing Section 8(1)(a) of the RTI Act, refused to provide the details of currency notes sent to various currency chests for the purpose of ReMon.
3) The CPIO has claimed that information about DeMon notes sent back to currency, chests every day, is available in a scattered manner and has invoked Section 7(9) of the RTI Act to say that collection of information would disproportionately divert the resources of the organisation.
There is no mention of any data about attacks on banks and bank premises in the CPIO's reply. (See here)
What is wrong with this reply?
Section 8(1)(a) contains at least seven grounds for rejecting access to information including scientific interests of the country and relations with foreign states apart from national security and defence matters. It is not clear which ground the CPIO wants to invoke amongst these to refuse information. It would be absurd to argue that all grounds are applicable. Further, Section 7(9) of the RTI Act cannot be used to reject access to information. The CPIO has a duty to provide information in some other form.
What is worse, the CPIO’s reply seems to be in complete ignorance of the DeMon-Remon procedure published by the government on November 8, 2016. Para #4 of this notification reads as follows:
"4. Every banking company referred to sub-paragraph (1) of paragraph 1, shall at the close of business of each day starting from 10th November, 2016, submit to the Reserve Bank, a statement showing the details of specified bank notes exchanged by it in such format as may be specified by the Reserve Bank."
So if the RBI has not yet devised a system for collecting and compiling this data from disaggregate sources, this may be another indicator of the haphazard manner in which DeMon-ReMon has been rolled out. Or the CPIO is providing completely misleading information. No other explanation is plausible.
How can DeMon-ReMon be studied in the absence of official data?
On new year’s eve, i.e., December 31, while addressing the nation, the PM hoped that economists and social scientists would study the DeMon-ReMon phenomenon in the days to come. The next day the media reported the finance minister as saying that his ministry will do its best to implement every word of what the PM announced in his speech. If official data is not placed either proactively or in reply to RTI applications, how can DeMon-ReMon exercise be studied in a credible manner? It will be nothing more than an analysis of people’s perceptions about DeMon-ReMon.
Unfortunately, the bureaucracy does not seem too eager to walk the talk of transparency that the leaders in government are voicing publicly.
There is an urgent need to make all data about DeMon-ReMon public. I hope readers will file more and more RTIs to squeeze out the data about this historic phenomenon to compel the government to take the path of transparency about this landmark exercise. Quoting a former TV news anchor, one can say, “The nation has the right to know.”
A videography survey in the Gyanvapi mosque in Varanasi this month, along with a similar survey in the mosque in Mathura permitted by a court, has brought the Places of Worship Act under focus after a gap of three decades. In 1991, at the peak of the Ram Janmabhoomi movement, the PV Narasimh
The Government of Gujarat had set up a task force committee in February 2022 under the chairmanship of Dr. Hasmukh Adhia, former union finance secretary, to work out a strategy for the state to contribute in making India a USD 5 trillion economy, as per the vision of the prime minister. In three months, th
This time it was not Lord Hanuman, but the poor decision-making of the political leaders combined with several global economic factors that set Sri Lanka in flames. A state of emergency was declared in Sri Lanka. This month, after the Prime Minister of Sri Lanka resigned from his post, the
Being and Becoming Multilingual: Some Narratives Edited by Rajesh Sachdeva and Rama Kant Agnihotri
The BrihanMumbai municipal corporation (BMC) has rejected the Congress accusations of financial irregularities worth Rs 8,000 crore—9,000 croe in awarding contracts for getting project-affected people (PAP) tenements on private land. BMC has said that it implements vital p
Does the concept of sedition have a place in modern democracies? This question became more relevant when the apex court recently put the country`s colonial-era sedition law on abeyance stating that there is a “requirement to balance… security interests and integrity of the State… and th