Face the future

Gadkari's new team reflects bad old politics

ajay

Ajay Singh | March 17, 2010



The much-awaited reconstitution of the BJP's national executive and team of office bearers reflects the party's drift rather than a coherent political strategy. The appointment of nearly a dozen vice-presidents and an equal number of general secretaries is a testimony to craving for power and pelf among top leaders who successfully coerced Nitin Gadkari to appoint their minions.

If Gadkari appointed Vijay Goel as general secretary to keep the Rajnath Singh faction in good humour, he took extra care to appoint Ananth Kumar not only as the senior-most general secretary but also as secretary of the Parliamentary board to placate the troika of Arun Jaitley-Venkaiah Naidu-Sushma Swaraj. Ananth Kumar's proximity to LK Advani clearly helped.

That Gadkari has been bending over backwards to be on the right side of the RSS is evident by the fact that he has given greater representation to the RSS volunteers in his team and also appointed two assistants to the RSS-loaned pracharak and general secretary Ram Lal. Similarly, the controversial Saudan Singh from Madhya Pradesh has been brought in despite his controversial conduct in the past. The induction of Hema Malini, Kirron Kher, Smriti Irani will only add a touch of glamour without substance.

A close look at Gadkari's decision only reveals that the BJP president has been doing a fine balancing act in every decision he has taken. Since he is a RSS nominee, he cannot afford to do anything that does not please his bosses in Nagpur. Given his inexperience in national politics, he has been seeking support of faction-ridden party leaders who are often working at cross-purposes. Like his predecessor Rajnath Singh, Gadkari is falling into the same trap of second-guessing his mentors in the RSS and keeping his senior colleagues happy. Gadkari's new team only suggests that the party's drift into wilderness is unlikely to be reversed.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter