Have mercy, leave communal politics out of Afzal hanging

Law and order consequences as a dangerous ruse for impeding justice

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | May 19, 2010



The more procedures, the less justice. Paraphrasing Cicero only states the fact, though, and does not even begin to unravel the sinister politics at the heart of the matter. The curious case of Mohammad Afzal, or Afzal Guru, is merely cloaked in procedures devised by ingenious governments in India to legitimise their designs to delay, thwart or subvert justice whenever they so choose. So Afzal Guru must wait his turn for justice to be executed, the Centre has been telling us these past four years, while Ajmal Amir Kasab may not have to wait for more than a year, the Union law minister in the same government has said.

Even when the Delhi government finally acted on Afzal Guru’s mercy petition, it advised the Centre to be prepared to deal with the law and order consequences in case the death sentence was executed. As the media has reported, according to procedure the home ministry asks the state government involved to submit its opinion on this specific issue. Since the Centre is in charge of Delhi Police, the Delhi government has followed the procedure and advised the Centre to prepare for the consequences. Both the home ministry’s query and the Delhi government’s reply amount to unwarranted, communally-motivated politicisation of the worst kind and, of course, militate against the idea of justice. Punishment must follow crime, come what may.

Should justice be delayed indefinitely because the government fears, or claims to fear, some kind of unrest? Is that, in turn, because Afzal Guru is a Kashmiri Muslim? In that case, why did the government bother about even going through the motions before stopping short of delivering justice? Is that not a mockery of the due process of law and justice in this country? Or is the government really guilty of vitiating the atmosphere by politicising Afzal Guru’s regional and religious identity?

The dangerous ruse of the so-called law and order consequences not only impedes justice but also weakens India’s resolve in the ongoing war on terror. It sends out undesirable signals to the world at large as well. If India cannot bring to justice the guilty within its boundaries, how can it expect Pakistan to act against the Pakistan-based terrorists it considers the masterminds of the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai? For that, the Congress party, which has ruled Delhi since 1998 and led the ruling coalition at the Centre since 2004, must be held squarely responsible.

Comments

 

Other News

MMRDA proposes formation of Fare Fixation Committee for Metro Lines 2A & 7

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has proposed the constitution of a Fare Fixation Committee (FFC) for Mumbai Metro Lines 2A and 7, currently operated by Maha Mumbai Metro Operation Corporation Limited (MMMOCL). ‘Fare Fixation’ is mandated under Section 33

‘Op Sindoor not an act of revenge, but a new form of justice’

Emphasizing that Operation Sindoor was not an act of revenge, but a new form of justice, prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday remarked that it was not just an expression of outrage but a display of India`s unwavering strength and determination. He asserted that the nation has adopted a bold approach, s

An ode to the enduring legacy of India’s temple culture

Dynasties of Devotion: The Secrets of 7 Iconic Hindu Temples By Deepa Mandlik (Translated from the Marathi by Aboli Mandlik) HarperCollins, 232 pages, Rs 399

How to improve India’s crèche system

India stands at a pivotal moment, caught between the promise of a demographic dividend and the crisis of gender inequality. While falling fertility rates, rising female education, and increasing labour force participation signal progress, policymakers continue to neglect one of the most invisible yet vital

Why trademarking ‘Operation Sindoor’ is not advisable

The question of whether the name ‘Operation Sindoor’ or even the standalone term ‘Sindoor’ can be registered as a trademark becomes complex and sensitive when viewed through the lens of its prior use by the Indian armed forces in a counter-terrorism operation. In such cases, the iss

JPC on simultaneous elections hold consultations in Maharashtra

The Joint Committee on the Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Ninth Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, has conducted extensive consultations with key stakeholders in Maharashtra regarding the feasibility and implications of simultaneous elections.

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter