Have mercy, leave communal politics out of Afzal hanging

Law and order consequences as a dangerous ruse for impeding justice

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | May 19, 2010



The more procedures, the less justice. Paraphrasing Cicero only states the fact, though, and does not even begin to unravel the sinister politics at the heart of the matter. The curious case of Mohammad Afzal, or Afzal Guru, is merely cloaked in procedures devised by ingenious governments in India to legitimise their designs to delay, thwart or subvert justice whenever they so choose. So Afzal Guru must wait his turn for justice to be executed, the Centre has been telling us these past four years, while Ajmal Amir Kasab may not have to wait for more than a year, the Union law minister in the same government has said.

Even when the Delhi government finally acted on Afzal Guru’s mercy petition, it advised the Centre to be prepared to deal with the law and order consequences in case the death sentence was executed. As the media has reported, according to procedure the home ministry asks the state government involved to submit its opinion on this specific issue. Since the Centre is in charge of Delhi Police, the Delhi government has followed the procedure and advised the Centre to prepare for the consequences. Both the home ministry’s query and the Delhi government’s reply amount to unwarranted, communally-motivated politicisation of the worst kind and, of course, militate against the idea of justice. Punishment must follow crime, come what may.

Should justice be delayed indefinitely because the government fears, or claims to fear, some kind of unrest? Is that, in turn, because Afzal Guru is a Kashmiri Muslim? In that case, why did the government bother about even going through the motions before stopping short of delivering justice? Is that not a mockery of the due process of law and justice in this country? Or is the government really guilty of vitiating the atmosphere by politicising Afzal Guru’s regional and religious identity?

The dangerous ruse of the so-called law and order consequences not only impedes justice but also weakens India’s resolve in the ongoing war on terror. It sends out undesirable signals to the world at large as well. If India cannot bring to justice the guilty within its boundaries, how can it expect Pakistan to act against the Pakistan-based terrorists it considers the masterminds of the 26/11 attacks in Mumbai? For that, the Congress party, which has ruled Delhi since 1998 and led the ruling coalition at the Centre since 2004, must be held squarely responsible.

Comments

 

Other News

Uday Kotak on history, Indian economy, growth and more

Pathbreakers: How 10 Visionary Leaders Transformed India by award-winning journalists  By Sucheta Dalal and Debashis Basu Rupa Publications, 304 pages, Rs 695  

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter