Besides increasing financial commitments, there is also a more strategic, impact-centred direction in CSR practice
The concept of Corporate Social Responsibility in India has witnessed a significant change through the years. What was earlier viewed as a statutory requirement is today more widely recognised as a catalyst for systemic, scalable, and sustainable change. This shift indicates how increased corporate awareness has linked social change with core business values and embedded it within national agendas toward long-term development results.
An Economic Times study covering 1,394 companies revealed a 15.7% year-on-year increase in CSR expenditure by NSE-listed companies in FY2024, which is the highest in four years. Besides increasing financial commitments, there is also a more strategic, impact-centred direction in CSR practice. Corporates are using systematic, data-driven methods and public-private convergence to amplify reach and relevance.
More contemporary CSR models are increasingly judged according to three important dimensions:
• Scalability: The upscaling ability of successful interventions across a geographic and demographic range.
• Sustainability: Ability to ensure long-term continuity and relevance beyond the period of original funding.
• Systemic Change: Degree of embedding in the current socio-economic systems, including changing policy, practice, and community-level behaviours at scale.
Achieving success across these axes often requires moving beyond siloed interventions toward collaborative ecosystem models.
One such model gaining traction in India is the cross-sector cooperation platform for social development. These frameworks bring together multiple companies to co-invest in thematic areas such as education, preventive healthcare, and sustainable infrastructure – sharing resources, responsibilities, and outcomes. By pooling financial, technical, and human capital, such platforms accelerate the scaling of proven solutions. They also foster multidisciplinary approaches that tackle intersecting challenges more holistically.
The advantages of these models are clear:
• Resource efficiency through reduced duplication and better coordination.
• Shared ownership that builds credibility and local trust.
• Stakeholder alignment that ensures continuity as new partners join and programmes evolve.
The culture of giving is also being nurtured from within with giving back coming from home. As CSR evolves, companies are encouraging employees to actively participate in social impact efforts – fostering deeper engagement, boosting morale, and creating a sense of shared purpose. Yet, sustainable change requires more than just good intent or individual goodwill. Corporates are focusing on strengthening the ecosystem by building capacity amongst NGO partners, as well – helping them to put in place the right people, processes and governance mechanisms. Empowered NGOs are better equipped to deliver consistent and scalable impact, making CSR efforts more resilient over time. This dual approach of internal engagement with external capability-building is key to driving meaningful and long-term change.
Another key pillar to implementing effective CSR is robust measurement and evaluation. While traditional CSR reporting is focused on spend and outputs, today’s stakeholders expect greater transparency around outcomes. Companies are therefore investing in stronger monitoring frameworks, data analytics, and third-party evaluations to assess what is working and where interventions can improve. This shift ensures accountability, facilitates better resource allocation, and helps replicate successful models across geographies. A focus on impact measurement transforms CSR from a cost-centre to a value-generating function closely aligned to the business’ purpose.
More corporates are embracing participatory development, where communities are co-creators of CSR programmes rather than passive recipients. This shift from ‘doing for’ to ‘doing with’ builds local ownership, makes interventions more relevant, and ensures long-term sustainability of the interventions. When people are party to the solution, they are more likely to safeguard and scale its impact.
CSR efforts become more impactful when aligned with national and state development goals. Collaborating with government schemes helps to avoid duplication and strengthens the last-mile delivery. Public-private partnerships bring scale, legitimacy, and the ability to influence policy over time.
The expansion of CSR in India is an indication of the corporate role in nation-building. This shift is not merely a function of increased funding but of deeper intentionality. But the true test of CSR lies not in the size of budgets or the scale of outputs – it lies in whether the change endures, adapts, and empowers. It's in the quiet pride of a child who learns in a properly furnished classroom and in a society that no longer waits to be helped but makes progress on its own. As corporates shift from compliance to conscience and from visibility to value, there is an essential reminder: CSR is not about us; it is about whom we serve. The one question we are constantly going to have to ask ourselves is not what more we can do but how differently we need to think because ultimately, CSR's legacy will not be in the projects we've done but in the possibilities we've created.
Shaina Ganapathy is Head of Community Outreach initiatives, Embassy Group.