Youngsters doing ‘earn while you learn’ feel it may not have enough to ease their strain
When the Union Budget 2026 was presented in Parliament, finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman spoke with assurance about economic growth, innovation and employment-led development. Rising revenue receipts were cited as a sign of a widening tax base, while increased expenditure reflected the government’s commitment to long-term national investment. At first glance, the budget appeared confident and forward-looking.
Away from the numbers and projections, however, exists another reality. It is shaped not by fiscal estimates, but by daily expenses. This is the reality of students who are already earning while pursuing their education.
For many young Indians, college is no longer a waiting period before employment begins. It has quietly become the point where work starts. A day of lectures is often followed by freelance tasks, internships, tutoring, online selling or content creation. This early entry into earning is frequently described as hustle culture. In practice, it is driven by rising costs, limited financial support and the need to become independent sooner than expected.
Students today plan their lives month by month. Rent or PG charges take up a significant share of income, especially in university towns. Transport costs accumulate steadily. Food inflation affects even the most basic routines. Exam fees, registration charges and academic requirements appear regularly and often without warning. Scholarships, when available, help with tuition, but they rarely ease these everyday pressures.
Equally important is the cost of staying employable. Skill development is no longer a one-time investment. Courses, certifications, software tools and subscriptions demand continuous spending. Learning has become ongoing, and so has the expense attached to it. While Budget 2026 placed strong emphasis on skills and future readiness, it did not directly address the financial strain students face while acquiring those skills.
Another cost that rarely enters policy discussions is digital access. For students who earn online, the internet is not a luxury. It is essential. Missed data recharges lead to missed deadlines. Poor connectivity results in lost opportunities. While the budget spoke of digital expansion and innovation, it did not engage with the recurring cost of staying connected.
Employment generation remained a central focus of Budget 2026, with attention given to manufacturing, infrastructure and strategic sectors. These investments are necessary and important. Yet they are designed to deliver results over time. Student income functions very differently. Freelance payments are irregular. Internships often offer limited compensation. Side incomes fluctuate. Inflation, meanwhile, remains steady. Rent rises, transport becomes costlier and food prices increase regardless of whether income arrives on time.
Taxes add another layer to this experience. Many first-time earners encounter taxation before fully understanding it. GST is built into courses, devices and everyday consumption. Platform deductions quietly reduce freelance earnings. In some cases, tax is deducted at source even when income is inconsistent. Tax relief measures announced in Budget 2026 largely favour stable salaried earners, offering little relevance to informal student incomes.
It is in this environment that many students begin to look beyond national borders. Decisions to study abroad are no longer driven only by academic opportunity. They are shaped by perceptions of economic clarity. Countries with simpler tax systems, clearer rules for student work, higher basic exemptions and predictable compliance appear easier to navigate. For first-time earners, knowing how much will be taxed and when matters deeply.
Over time, this clarity influences long-term choices. Students who go abroad often find it easier to work, save and plan. Tax convenience, combined with stable income and transparent systems, encourages them to stay. What begins as an education decision gradually turns into a settlement decision.
Brain drain, therefore, is not only about talent leaving the country. It is also about confidence. When effort converts more predictably into stability elsewhere, migration becomes a rational response. For an economy that depends heavily on its young population, this quiet shift carries serious consequences.
A deeper issue lies in how policy categorises people. The budget speaks of students, workers, entrepreneurs and gig participants as separate groups. In reality, many young Indians occupy all these roles at once. This blended identity remains largely unrecognised.
The younger generation does not reject the vision presented in Budget 2026. It simply feels removed from everyday experience. What is sought is not only future opportunity, but acknowledgment of present contribution. Until policy begins to reflect the monthly realities of those working before graduation, the distance between parliamentary ambition and student life will continue to be measured quietly in expenses, and increasingly, in departures.
Annu Shree is a student of Bennett University.