Nor-Chanakya

Wither Pranab Mukherjee's political wile?

sarthak

Sarthak Ray | March 17, 2011



Back against the wall with the opposition holding Wikileaks cables on the cash-for-votes scam to its head, the UPA government really needed a hero or a miracle to save face in Parliament today. None came to its rescue.

This is one dragon which even that aging Galahad of the Congress - Pranab Mukherjee - failed to slay.

Mukherjee's three-point rebuttal was as weak a defence as they come.

Beginning with the weakest of the three, that the matters of the 14th Lok Sabha can not be debated in the 15th Lok Sabha, we ask "why not?" Has the Bofors case not been around for decades now? Didn't UPA2 rush to point out that the first-come, first serve policy for telecom sector was a policy of the NDA government from the 13th Lok Sabha? Governance is not subject to Parliament terms. It spills over tenures, Mukherjee should have kept in mind.

He also argued that the correspondence between a sovereign nation and its mission has diplomatic immunity, and therefore, it can neither be denied nor be confirmed. It is hard to believe that the Congress veteran is capable of such political naiveté. The documents may enjoy diplomatic immunity but does UPA enjoy immunity as well? The documents are now in the realm of the public. We are well past the time when these fawning courtesies countries accord each other could have been invoked. The contents are damning and the government has to answer.

More importantly, the disembodied voice of the opposition had not asked for a ratification of the documents. It had asked for the government to bear onus and take action (always the same - the removal of the prime minister). Mukherjee's ill-geared stab at deflection, therefore, is a redundancy. And also a particularly strong hint at the grand old party's guilt in the matter, one could be prompted to think.

His final argument is one we have all made out of desperation, when cornered. The "Can you prove it?" manoeuvre. He, of course, deferring to the judiciary, added "in court" to the question. Ludicruous as it may seem, it is Pranab Mukherjee - Chanakya of the Congress - who fails to realise that judicial opinion in this case would be much less damning than public opinion.

Comments

 

Other News

Can AI change India’s breast cancer story?

Breast cancer has become a public-health challenge in India. The greatest opportunity is to find cancers earlier. Artificial intelligence (AI) is opening a new era in breast cancer detection. AI systems can analyse mammograms and other breast-imaging studies, identify subtle abnormalities and assist radi

Farm stability in the time of climate change

Indian agriculture is experiencing significant climate volatility, while the world economy seems to be in a highly volatile situation. Economic indices from various countries show that they need to recalibrate their strategies to withstand economic headwinds. In such a challenging situation, a country li

El Niño threatens India’s Rabi crops

India’s southwest monsoon ended with a 13% rainfall deficit in 2026, its weakest performance in a decade, raising concerns over agricultural production, water security and the upcoming rabi season. With El Niño expected to persist into early 2027, experts warn that declining soil moisture, dep

Regulating the data advantage: India’s new e-Commerce framework

For over a decade, India’s e-commerce story has rested on a simple premise: platforms connect buyers and sellers, while data fuels efficiency, personalisation, and scale. However, as the market matured, its structure has revealed a growing imbalance. E-commerce platforms, especially marketplace ent

Changing weather patterns, climate change responsible for Nepal floods

The interaction between active Western Disturbances, increased atmospheric moisture and the region’s complex topography aswell as global warming are important factors behind intense rainfall in the Himalayas, leading to flash floods in Nepal, according to meteorologists. Nepal

A right she cannot reach

Last summer, the two of us spent several weeks in rural Madhya Pradesh with a non-profit that works on gender justice through women’s self-help groups. We went in with a notebook full of laws. The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act. The Dowry Prohibition Act. Free legal aid for every wo

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter