Nor-Chanakya

Wither Pranab Mukherjee's political wile?

sarthak

Sarthak Ray | March 17, 2011



Back against the wall with the opposition holding Wikileaks cables on the cash-for-votes scam to its head, the UPA government really needed a hero or a miracle to save face in Parliament today. None came to its rescue.

This is one dragon which even that aging Galahad of the Congress - Pranab Mukherjee - failed to slay.

Mukherjee's three-point rebuttal was as weak a defence as they come.

Beginning with the weakest of the three, that the matters of the 14th Lok Sabha can not be debated in the 15th Lok Sabha, we ask "why not?" Has the Bofors case not been around for decades now? Didn't UPA2 rush to point out that the first-come, first serve policy for telecom sector was a policy of the NDA government from the 13th Lok Sabha? Governance is not subject to Parliament terms. It spills over tenures, Mukherjee should have kept in mind.

He also argued that the correspondence between a sovereign nation and its mission has diplomatic immunity, and therefore, it can neither be denied nor be confirmed. It is hard to believe that the Congress veteran is capable of such political naiveté. The documents may enjoy diplomatic immunity but does UPA enjoy immunity as well? The documents are now in the realm of the public. We are well past the time when these fawning courtesies countries accord each other could have been invoked. The contents are damning and the government has to answer.

More importantly, the disembodied voice of the opposition had not asked for a ratification of the documents. It had asked for the government to bear onus and take action (always the same - the removal of the prime minister). Mukherjee's ill-geared stab at deflection, therefore, is a redundancy. And also a particularly strong hint at the grand old party's guilt in the matter, one could be prompted to think.

His final argument is one we have all made out of desperation, when cornered. The "Can you prove it?" manoeuvre. He, of course, deferring to the judiciary, added "in court" to the question. Ludicruous as it may seem, it is Pranab Mukherjee - Chanakya of the Congress - who fails to realise that judicial opinion in this case would be much less damning than public opinion.

Comments

 

Other News

How the mind can help the body heal itself

Why do some people recover from illness against all odds? Can our beliefs, emotions and consciousness influence the body’s ability to heal? Drawing on over three decades of experience in medicine, research and medical innovation, internationally trained ophthalmologist and author Dr Dinesh Verma ex

1,364 anti-cancer formulations to cost less from today

The National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA), under the Department of Pharmaceuticals, Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers, has capped trade margins on the Maximum Retail Price (MRP) of 137 anti-cancer drugs. This was based on the recommendations of an Expert Committee constitute

Who checks the books?

I read about the news about the Coimbatore library over coffee this morning. On the face of it, the headline was about a political ‘war’ between the DMK and TVK. But what stayed with me was something much more important than the blame game behind what had transpired. A writer walking through

Development paradox: Falling poverty miracle and an inequality problem

India’s reduction in poverty over the past decade is a development achievement of considerable significance. The World Bank’s April 2026 ‘India Development Update’ estimates that the share of Indians living below the international extreme-poverty line of $3.00 per person per day i

In Arunachal, a river we call mother

In Arunachal Pradesh, the Siang is not just a river. For many of us, especially the Adi people, it is part of our family. Our grandparents fished in it. Children learned to swim in it. Our farms drink from it. When someone says a huge dam will be built on it, we do not hear the word "project".

A new retelling of the Mahabharata delves into key moments

In a time when every decision carries consequences and questions of ambition, power, loyalty, identity and moral choice continue to shape our lives, Dr. Arun Krishnan’s new book, ‘Mahakshana’ (Penguin India) offers a strikingly relevant retelling of the Mahabharata.  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter