Should the government compel Navodaya Vidyalayas to install statues of Rajiv Gandhi?

kapil

Kapil Bajaj | June 7, 2010



The central government-run Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti has reportedly ordered about 570 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) across the country to install busts of Rajiv Gandhi in order to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the rural schools scheme by honouring the seventh prime minister of India.

Named after Jawahar Lal Nehru, who died long before the Navodaya scheme was started in 1986 by the government headed by his grandson, the residential schools have a tight deadline of August 20 to adhere to. They must use their scarce human resources – at a time when most of the teachers and pupils go home on summer vacations – in creating ‘Rajiv Gandhi Smriti Vans’ on their premises with the statue of the Congress leader.

What justifies such an action? Is it the fact that Rajiv Gandhi’s government started the Navodaya scheme? Why then has it taken successive Congress-led governments 25 years to force the schools to honour the memory of Rajiv Gandhi?

And what could have been Navodaya Vidyalayas’ connection with Nehru to be named after him?

What next?

Indira Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi….. the offspring of Priyanka Gandhi.

In fact, one can also go up the Nehru family tree to Moti Lal Nehru, as well as the Gandhi family tree up to Feroz Gandhi.

After creating Smriti Vans for all these worthies, JNVs will look something like museums in the memory of Gandhi-Nehru dynasty.
Would the governments led by BJP be justified then to force the JNVs to create Smriti Vans for Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Deen Dayal Upadhaya, Atal Bihari Vaypayee, etc.?

It’s something like asking: after Mayawati’s drive to spend crore of public funds on building statues of herself, will we see Mulayam Singh doing the same to ‘memorialize his greatness’ if he comes to power next?

But Maya is small fry compared to generations of dynasty-worshipping, spineless creatures who have made Congress probably the world’s most sycophantic party.

Their leaders pretend to work to promote democracy while reinforcing a dynastic and personality cult that insidiously damages whatever amount of democracy is found in our polity and society.

Judge it yourself.
 

Comments

 

Other News

The Xi-Trump summit: The unending rivalry

Diplomacy is akin to an art, wherein the summitry, conflict resolution and negotiations form apt constituents of the entire context of deal making and “playing for keeps” in the international arena. The Xi-Trump summit in Washington last week, in which the American president broke all conside

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

From pyramid to platform: BRICS agenda for Global South

In his opening address at the 18th BRICS Summit in New Delhi on September 12, prime minister Narendra Modi did something India`s diplomacy has been building towards for three years: he moved the ‘Voice of the Global South’ from a slogan to a work plan. Addressing the leaders, he argued that t

How to realise the full transformative potential of PM-JAY

The Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (PM-JAY), a welfare scheme which covers approximately 45 crore beneficiaries across India, provides cashless health cover of Rs. 5 lakh per family per year. It is the largest health insurance scheme which helped crores of poor families by reducing out-of-pocket expend

The missing men in India`s family planning story

Every pregnancy requires two people. Yet India`s family planning programme continues to ask only one of them to bear almost all of its medical consequences. The newly released National Family Health Survey-6 (2023-24) confirms just how entrenched this asymmetry remains: 36.5% of currently married women a

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter