Should the government compel Navodaya Vidyalayas to install statues of Rajiv Gandhi?

kapil

Kapil Bajaj | June 7, 2010



The central government-run Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti has reportedly ordered about 570 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) across the country to install busts of Rajiv Gandhi in order to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the rural schools scheme by honouring the seventh prime minister of India.

Named after Jawahar Lal Nehru, who died long before the Navodaya scheme was started in 1986 by the government headed by his grandson, the residential schools have a tight deadline of August 20 to adhere to. They must use their scarce human resources – at a time when most of the teachers and pupils go home on summer vacations – in creating ‘Rajiv Gandhi Smriti Vans’ on their premises with the statue of the Congress leader.

What justifies such an action? Is it the fact that Rajiv Gandhi’s government started the Navodaya scheme? Why then has it taken successive Congress-led governments 25 years to force the schools to honour the memory of Rajiv Gandhi?

And what could have been Navodaya Vidyalayas’ connection with Nehru to be named after him?

What next?

Indira Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi….. the offspring of Priyanka Gandhi.

In fact, one can also go up the Nehru family tree to Moti Lal Nehru, as well as the Gandhi family tree up to Feroz Gandhi.

After creating Smriti Vans for all these worthies, JNVs will look something like museums in the memory of Gandhi-Nehru dynasty.
Would the governments led by BJP be justified then to force the JNVs to create Smriti Vans for Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Deen Dayal Upadhaya, Atal Bihari Vaypayee, etc.?

It’s something like asking: after Mayawati’s drive to spend crore of public funds on building statues of herself, will we see Mulayam Singh doing the same to ‘memorialize his greatness’ if he comes to power next?

But Maya is small fry compared to generations of dynasty-worshipping, spineless creatures who have made Congress probably the world’s most sycophantic party.

Their leaders pretend to work to promote democracy while reinforcing a dynastic and personality cult that insidiously damages whatever amount of democracy is found in our polity and society.

Judge it yourself.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Not just politics, let`s discuss policies too

Why public policy matters Most days, India`s loudest debates stop at the ballot box. We can name every major leader and recall every campaign slogan. Still, far fewer of us can explain why a widow`s pension is delayed or how a government school`s budget is actually approved. That

When algorithms decide and children die

The images have not left me, of dead and wounded children being carried in the arms of the medics and relatives to the ambulances and hospitals. On February 28, at the start of Operation Epic Fury, cruise missiles struck the Shajareh Tayyebeh school – officially named a girls’ school, in Minab,

The economics of representation: Why women in power matter

India’s democracy has grown in scale, but not quite in balance. Women today are active participants in elections, influencing outcomes in ways that were not as visible earlier. Yet their presence in legislative institutions continues to lag behind. The Nari Shakti Vandan Adhiniyam was meant to addres

India will be powerful, not aggressive: Bhaiyyaji

India is poised to emerge as a global power but will remain rooted in its civilisational ethos of non-aggression and harmony, former RSS General Secretary Suresh `Bhaiyyaji` Joshi has said.   He was speaking at the launch of “Rashtrabhav,” a book by Ravindra Sathe

AI: Code, Control, Conquer

India today stands at a critical juncture in the area of artificial intelligence. While the country is among the fastest adopters of AI in the world, it remains heavily reliant on technologies developed elsewhere. This paradox, experts warn, cannot persist if India seeks technological sovereignty.

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter