Should the government compel Navodaya Vidyalayas to install statues of Rajiv Gandhi?

kapil

Kapil Bajaj | June 7, 2010



The central government-run Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti has reportedly ordered about 570 Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas (JNVs) across the country to install busts of Rajiv Gandhi in order to celebrate the 25th anniversary of the rural schools scheme by honouring the seventh prime minister of India.

Named after Jawahar Lal Nehru, who died long before the Navodaya scheme was started in 1986 by the government headed by his grandson, the residential schools have a tight deadline of August 20 to adhere to. They must use their scarce human resources – at a time when most of the teachers and pupils go home on summer vacations – in creating ‘Rajiv Gandhi Smriti Vans’ on their premises with the statue of the Congress leader.

What justifies such an action? Is it the fact that Rajiv Gandhi’s government started the Navodaya scheme? Why then has it taken successive Congress-led governments 25 years to force the schools to honour the memory of Rajiv Gandhi?

And what could have been Navodaya Vidyalayas’ connection with Nehru to be named after him?

What next?

Indira Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi….. the offspring of Priyanka Gandhi.

In fact, one can also go up the Nehru family tree to Moti Lal Nehru, as well as the Gandhi family tree up to Feroz Gandhi.

After creating Smriti Vans for all these worthies, JNVs will look something like museums in the memory of Gandhi-Nehru dynasty.
Would the governments led by BJP be justified then to force the JNVs to create Smriti Vans for Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Deen Dayal Upadhaya, Atal Bihari Vaypayee, etc.?

It’s something like asking: after Mayawati’s drive to spend crore of public funds on building statues of herself, will we see Mulayam Singh doing the same to ‘memorialize his greatness’ if he comes to power next?

But Maya is small fry compared to generations of dynasty-worshipping, spineless creatures who have made Congress probably the world’s most sycophantic party.

Their leaders pretend to work to promote democracy while reinforcing a dynastic and personality cult that insidiously damages whatever amount of democracy is found in our polity and society.

Judge it yourself.
 

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter