Govt went overboard on exempting CBI from RTI

Documents reveal that the agency wanted partial exemption

danish

Danish Raza | October 21, 2011



Government documents obtained through the right to information have revealed that the government decided to keep the CBI completely out of the transparency act while the investigating agency had demanded partial exemption.

The documents reveal that while the agency asked for exemptions in certain quarters and files regarding the same did the rounds in various departments, the department of personnel and training kept the CBI out of the RTI.

“Legal opinion was repeatedly sought by the government for the right advice and the right request from the CBI. This has been revealed in a set of confidential documents, ironically released through RTI to activist Subhash Agarwal,” said the news report in Hindustan Times newspaper.

According to the report, a CBI official conceded that the agency sensed the government wanted to give them a blanket exemption and played along.

“The CBI's original demand around January 2011 was for exemption of intelligence collection, internal analysis of evidence and its sources from RTI. But the department of personnel that implements RTI found the request vague and asked for a fresh proposal,” said the report.

Social activist Subhash Chandra Agrawal obtained the documents through RTI.

The report says that in February, the CBI submitted a proposal to DoPT asking for exemption of information relating to administration, personnel, accounts/finance, budget and training.

DoPT sought the law ministry’s opinion on the same.

The then solicitor general Gopal Subarmanium said that the demand was justified but the committee of secretaries termed it impractical.

The matter then rested with the law ministry. This was when Attorney General, GE Vahanvati disagreed with Subarmanium and advised that the agency should be put under the list of organisations exempted from the RTI.

Union minister Veerapa Moily supported Vahanvati’s views and the same was approved soon by the panel of secretaries.

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter