One verdict that impacts three major cases -Governance Now

One verdict that impacts three major cases

Aadhaar, online freedom of expression and homosexuality would have to be considered on a case-to-case basis following the right to privacy verdict

GN Bureau | August 24, 2017

#supreme court #right to privacy #aadhaar

The supreme court’s verdict upholding privacy as a fundamental right is likely to have an impact on at least three major cases – Aadhaar, online freedom of expression and homosexuality.

On Aadhaar, the government would now have to defend itself in the supreme court where it has submitted that it is essential to collect biometric details of the citizens. The government has repeatedly assured that the people are well protected.

Petitioners have said that forcing people to use Aadhaar is an infringement of their right to privacy. They say that Aadhaar began as a voluntary effort and slowly the government has made it mandatory for various government schemes.

Data protection is at the crux of the Aadhaar debate.

In April 2017, when the apex court was hearing the WhatsApp privacy policy case, Attorney general Mukul Rohatgi told a five-judge constitution bench that the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India was in the process of evolving the data protection framework.

People share loads of information on Twitter, Facebook and WhatsApp and there is a need for protecting that data.

In 2015, the Supreme Court had struck down section 66A of the IT act under which many people were arrested for criticising politicians, government or for their satirical overtones.

The supreme court had upheld section 377, effectively criminalizing consensual homosexual activity between two consenting adults.

The LGTB activists have repeatedly stressed that what happens in their bedroom is private and the state cannot interfere.

The latest verdict would most likely open the debate on privacy with regard to the LGBT community.

With the supreme court deciding that privacy is a fundamental right, the other major cases would have to dealt on a case-to-case basis.

Comments

Other News

What unpaid nation builders want from policymakers

The Supreme Court recently described homemakers as “nation builders” and fixed a notional monthly income of Rs 30,000 for them in motor accident compensation cases. The judgment was not about wages. It was about compensation. Yet it inadvertently raised a larger economic question: If a homemake

What the US–Iran peace deal means for India

After months of rising tensions, the United States and Iran have reached a memorandum of understanding called the "Islamabad Agreement." This agreement allows for the immediate reopening of the Strait of Hormuz without tolls and provides Iran with relief from sanctions, depending on its complianc

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation. During