Protection for whistleblowers

Mumbai police issues new guidelines

danish

Danish Raza | February 19, 2010



Mumbai Police Commissioner D. Shivanandan has issued a circular directing all police stations to promptly take cognizance of complaints lodged by activists and concerned citizens.

According to the circular, when an activist makes a request for police protection, a threat perception report (TPR) will immediately be prepared and submitted to the police commissioner for a decision on the same.

“In appropriate cases, inputs from the crime branch will also be taken while preparing the TPR,” said the circular.

Also, every time the duty officer receives a complaint, he will inform the in-charge of the police station and will immediately register a complaint as non cognizable (NC) or First Information Report (FIR) depending on the facts
or circumstances of the case.

If the facts disclose neither a FIR nor a NC, the activist will be informed so in writing.

Senior police inspector of that police station will personally monitor the enquiry of complaint in such cases.

Local activists working in various public causes will be inducted into the police-public coordination committee at the police station level to ensure better coordination and to immediately redress local issues.

However, the activists in Mumbai are cynical about the circular. “It sounds good. But let us see how much they actually do,” said Krishna Raj Rao, Mumbai-based social activist.

“They say that the duty officer will inform the senior inspector and will register the complaint as NC or FIR. This never happens. The duty officer tries his best to shoo away the complainant or at best would lodge an NC on
which no action is ever taken,” said social activist G.N Vora.

Activists in Maharasthra are lobbying hard for protection to whistleblowers under threat.

RTI activist Satish Shetty was killed in January near his home on the outskirts of Pune. Shetty, 39, had exposed irregularities in land deals in and around Pune.
 

Comments

 

Other News

Gandhian movement after Gandhi failed: Ram Guha

The Gandhian movement in India, after Gandhi’s death, failed, says Ramachandra Guha, and blames Vinoba Bhave for it. But the movement found new, fertile grounds around the world and succeeded in bringing about a change in South Africa, the US and elsewhere. It is high time it returned home. Of cour

When religion, politics and Bollywood come together

Tavleen Singh, noted journalist and political commentator, has turned to fiction, with her debut novel ‘The Actor’ (HaperCollins India). Set in the near future, it has a superstar, Amit Singh, turning to politics, when the political landscape is dominated by prime minister Guru Gaynendraj

Cabinet approves setting up of Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority

The union cabinet, chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, on Tuesday approved the setting up of a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV), called Integrated Transport & Logistics Authority (ITLA), to strengthen research, planning, appraisal, monitoring and impact assessment within the broad domains of Transp

Why foundational literacy and numeracy is key to school education

Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN) are often described as the building blocks of education. Yet, their significance goes well beyond a child’s ability to read a sentence, write a response or solve a basic mathematical problem. These foundational skills shape how children understand the world,

When police data becomes the algorithm

For decades, policing has followed a familiar sequence: a crime occurs, the police respond, an investigation produces records and those records become part of the institutional memory of the criminal justice system. Artificial intelligence is beginning to alter that sequence. Instead of merely recording

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter