Study uncovers genetic susceptibility behind high oral cancer burden in India

Tata Memorial Centre researchers call for targeted prevention and Indian-specific genetic risk tools

geetanjali

Geetanjali Minhas | November 29, 2025 | Mumbai


#Healthcare   #Health   #Cancer  
(From L to R) Dr. Sharayu Mhatre, Dr. Gauravi Mishra, Dy. Director CCE, Dr. Rajesh Dixit, Director, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, and Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Director, ACTREC, at the briefing in Mumbai on Saturday
(From L to R) Dr. Sharayu Mhatre, Dr. Gauravi Mishra, Dy. Director CCE, Dr. Rajesh Dixit, Director, Centre for Cancer Epidemiology, and Dr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Director, ACTREC, at the briefing in Mumbai on Saturday

A Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) conducted by the Centre for Cancer Epidemiology (CCE) of the Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC) at the Tata Memorial Centre here has uncovered critical genetic factors that explain why some tobacco chewers in India develop oral cancer nearly a decade earlier than others. The findings were published in eBioMedicine, part of The Lancet Discovery Science.

The study compared 2,160 Buccal Mucosa cancer cases with 2,325 controls from different regions of India. Through a comprehensive genome-wide scan, researchers identified significant genetic risk loci on chromosomes 5 and 6, near these genes: 

    CLPTM1L-TERT
    HLA-DRB1
    HLA-DQB1
    CEP43

A meta-analysis incorporating data from Europe and Taiwan further identified novel risk loci near the NOTCH1 gene, underscoring genetic pathways shared across populations.

The investigators generated a polygenic risk score (PRS) and discovered that tobacco chewers with a high PRS developed Buccal Mucosa cancer 10 years earlier than those with a low PRS. Despite similar lifestyle exposures, genetics emerged as a powerful differentiator in cancer onset.

India reports over 141,000 cases of oral cancer annually, with age-standardized incidence rates reaching 25–33 per 100,000 in some states. This study provides the first genetic explanation for why certain individuals are significantly more vulnerable despite similar tobacco habits.

During a media briefing here on Saturday, Dr Sudeep Gupta, director, Tata Memorial Centre, highlighted the importance of studying gene environment interactions in common cancers in India. He stressed that although genetics influence susceptibility, more than 80% of oral cancers can be prevented through effective tobacco-control measures.

Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi, director, ACTREC, reiterated that tobacco chewing increases oral cancer risk 26-fold. He added that individuals with high genetic susceptibility have double the risk compared to those with a low genetic risk score.

The study has been hailed by international experts. Dr Elisabete Weiderpass, director, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC–WHO), described the work as a “significant advance in understanding the interplay of genetics and tobacco chewing”. She emphasized its value in shaping tailored prevention and screening strategies for high-risk populations.

Dr Nilanjan Chatterjee, Johns Hopkins University, noted that the study is the first to clarify how genes amplify the carcinogenic effect of tobacco chewing. “We don’t choose the genes we’re born with,” he said, “which makes healthy behavioural choices even more critical.”

Dr  Rajesh Dikshit, director of CCE, explained that pathway analysis from the study identified distinct immune mechanisms and nicotine receptor encoding genes involved in the development of oral cancer. Understanding these pathways may lead to targeted strategies for early detection and prevention.

Lead author Dr  Sharayu Mhatre, scientific officer at CCE, noted that while tobacco remains the dominant risk factor, Indian-specific genetic architecture differs notably from European populations. She reported a 24% relative excess of oral cancer cases among tobacco chewers with high genetic risk scores compared to low-risk groups.

Dr  Preetha Rajaraman, Radiation Effects Research Foundation (Japan), emphasized the potential for personalized screening by combining behavioral risk (tobacco) with genetic susceptibility.

Dr   Siddhartha Kar, University of Cambridge, called the work a “major milestone for cancer genomics in India,” citing its identification of uniquely Indian genetic risk factors.

CCE is now conducting GWAS on several other common cancer types in India to build genetic risk scores that can inform prevention and early detection strategies nationwide.

Dr  Sharayu Mhatre highlighted the critical need for large sample sizes to fully understand the genetic factors contributing to cancer causation.

Comments

 

Other News

V. M. Tarkunde: A legal luminary par excellence

14 Lawyers: Portraits from The Bar By Raju Ramachandran  Juggernaut, 248 pages, Rs. 799  

The Cost of Obesity

The latest episode of Checks and Balances focuses on the ticking time bomb of obesity in India, and Geetanjali Minhas of Governance Now spoke with a panel of experts. You can watch the episode here: https://youtu.be/mH

US-Iran deal: Path to peace or prelude to deeper regional quagmire?

In the midst of deep mistrust, the US and Iran are reported to have reached a framework deal for ending the West Asian conflict. But whether it will result in any meaningful breakthrough or pave the way for any lasting peace in the region, is in the realm of speculation.   During

Lived life, philosophy, spirituality and other enigmas

The Ashes Are Warm: Memories of a Lifetime Spent with UG Krishnamurti By Mahesh Bhatt and Sunita Pant Bansal Rupa Publications, 384 pages, Rs 495  

In Varanasi, fringe expansion vs. core heritage

For centuries, the urban framework of Varanasi was defined not just by its relationship with the sacred Ganga but by its multifaceted network of urban commons. Historic kunds, seasonal talabs (ponds), and open maidans served as the city’s basic ecological infrastructure. Th

What ails India`s skill development ecosystem

India’s skill development programmes were designed with a goal to make the young population ready with market-required skills and competencies, and to provide them with better employment opportunities. Yet the outcomes have fallen short of that goal: though over 1.6 crore individuals were trained acr





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter