Addressing mental harassment in workplaces

By combining strong legal frameworks with proactive corporate policies, we can create safer and more inclusive work environments

Dinesh Jotwani | December 18, 2024


#Gender   #Law  
(Image: Public Domain)
(Image: Public Domain)

Workplace mental harassment, often referred to as workplace bullying or psychological harassment, is a pressing issue that affects employees across industries. This form of harassment can lead to significant emotional distress, reduced productivity and, in severe cases, long-term mental health issues. Addressing this problem requires a concerted effort from legal frameworks and corporate policies.

Understanding Mental Harassment
Mental harassment in the workplace encompasses repeated behaviour intended to humiliate, intimidate, or undermine an employee. It may include verbal abuse, unjustified criticism, exclusion, excessive monitoring, or assigning impossible tasks. Such behaviour can create a hostile work environment, impacting the targeted individual and overall workplace morale.

The Legal Landscape
Many countries have laws aimed at preventing workplace harassment, but specific legal provisions addressing mental harassment are still evolving. For instance:

1.    India: The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act, 2013 covers harassment that can include mental and emotional abuse. Additionally, courts in India recognize psychological harassment under broader labour laws, such as in cases involving workplace bullying. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, mandates certain organizations to prevent unfair labour practices, including harassment. Recent legal reforms such as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, have introduced stricter penalties for workplace intimidation and psychological abuse, highlighting the seriousness of mental harassment. Additionally, provisions under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, address broader employee safety concerns, while the Bharatiya Sakshya Bill, 2023, strengthens mechanisms for evidence collection in harassment cases.

2.    European Union:
Several EU directives emphasize the importance of mental well-being at work, encouraging member states to adopt anti-harassment measures.

3.    France: The French Labor Code explicitly prohibits moral harassment (harcèlement moral), which includes repeated acts that degrade working conditions and harm a person's rights, dignity, or physical and mental health.

4.    Canada: Provincial laws, such as in Quebec, prohibit psychological harassment, defined as vexatious behaviour that affects an employee's dignity or psychological well-being.

Corporate Responsibility
Legal compliance is just the first step. Organizations must go beyond minimum legal requirements to foster a culture of respect and inclusion. Here’s how they can take proactive measures:

1.    Develop Clear Policies: A comprehensive anti-harassment policy should explicitly address mental harassment, defining unacceptable behaviours and the consequences of such actions.
2.    Training and Awareness: Regular training sessions can educate employees and managers about recognizing and addressing mental harassment. Awareness campaigns can also help destigmatize seeking help.
3.    Establish Reporting Mechanisms: Companies should create safe, confidential, and accessible channels for employees to report harassment. Whistleblower protections must be enforced to prevent retaliation.
4.    Provide Support Systems: Employee assistance programs, counselling services, and mental health resources should be readily available to affected employees.
5.    Monitor and Review: Periodic assessments of workplace culture and anonymous surveys can help identify potential issues and measure the effectiveness of implemented policies.

The Role of Leadership
Leadership plays a pivotal role in addressing mental harassment. Leaders must model respectful behaviour, take swift action against offenders, and ensure that all employees feel valued and heard. By championing a zero-tolerance policy, leaders can set the tone for a healthier work environment.

The Business Case for Addressing Mental Harassment
Organizations that prioritize mental well-being benefit from:
1.    Increased Productivity: Employees perform better when they feel safe and respected.
2.    Reduced Turnover: A supportive workplace culture can lower attrition rates.
3.    Enhanced Reputation: Companies known for their commitment to employee welfare attract top talent and maintain better stakeholder relationships.

Call for Specific Legislation
The evolving recognition of mental harassment as a significant issue has led to advocacy for:
•    Explicit legal definitions of mental harassment.
•    Enhanced mechanisms for reporting and addressing complaints.
•    Greater penalties for violations to deter such conduct.

Conclusion
Addressing mental harassment in the workplace is both a legal obligation and a moral imperative. By combining strong legal frameworks with proactive corporate policies, we can create safer and more inclusive work environments. Recent legal reforms in India, such as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and related laws, highlight the urgent need for stringent enforcement mechanisms and improved employee protections.

The responsibility to recognize, address, and eliminate mental harassment lies with all stakeholders—governments, organizations, and individuals. In fostering such an environment, we not only protect individual well-being but also pave the way for sustainable organizational growth and a more equitable society.

Dinesh Jotwani is co-managing partner at Jotwani Associates.

Comments

 

Other News

₹5,000 crore saved from suspected financial fraud

In a significant gain for citizen protection in the digital economy, the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) has helped prevent suspected cyber fraud losses of more than ₹5,000 crore through its Financial Fraud Risk Indicator (FRI) within fifteen months of its launch on May 22, 2025. This money did

Capital acquisition proposals worth Rs 1.10 lakh crore for defence forces cleared

The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), under the chairmanship of Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh, on Monday accorded Acceptance of Necessity (AoN), that is, in-principle administrative approval to various acquisition proposals of the defence forces at an estimated cost of about Rs 1,10,000 crore.

How Rafi, Raj Kapoor helped pave the way for a great uranium deal

There`s a certain moment in diplomacy that`s too personal to be captured in a communiqué, too small to make the front page, but more revealing than the front page. This week, prime minister Narendra Modi reached Tashkent and, amid the pomp of state visits, managed to evoke the old Bollywood tunes

Distinguishing Fish 1 and Fish 2: The pragmatism behind India’s WTO ratification

 India became the 123rd WTO member to ratify the multilateral Agreement on Fisheries subsidies (AoFS) when it deposited the Instrument of Acceptance for Phase 1 on July 20, 2026. The ratification is restricted to disciplining Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing (IUU), protection for overfished

The 7% growth problem: Why the next 7% will be harder

India has become accustomed to hearing the 7% growth number. It is now less a milestone than an expectation. Yet the paradox is becoming clearer: maintaining 7% growth may be considerably harder than achieving it once. India’s real GDP grew 7.7% in FY2025–26, following growth of 6.5% in FY202

The Constitution cannot be altered: Justice Abhay Oka

Justice Abhay Oka, who retired from the Supreme Court in May 2025, has said that the Constitution of India cannot be altered. Explaining the landmark Kesavananda Bharati judgment (1973) on the basic structure of the Constitution, he said, “This is one judgment that has saved democracy in India.&rdq

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter