Are the interlocutors speaking for the centre?

Whatever the answer, the next question is: why?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | October 30, 2010



If somebody were to tell you that the solution to the Kashmir imbroglio will have to be found outside the ambit of the constitution, you will dismiss the suggestion without so much as a second thought. If the same is said by somebody authorised by the central government, though, it is a matter of serious concern. The three-member team of interlocutors sent by the centre to the valley has repeatedly struck discordant notes – it started off by saying that Pakistan will have to be engaged to arrive at any solution on Kashmir. Either the team has seriously mistaken its brief or somebody down there in the ivory tower of New Delhi has got a startlingly original conception of the role of interlocutors.

Interlocutor is commonly understood to be someone who is involved in a conversation and who is representing someone else. When the centre announced the team comprising Dileep Padgaonkar, M M Ansari and Radha Kumar, it was expected that these three would engage with various political and social sections in the valley on behalf of the centre. Of course, there was widespread apprehension that this team would not carry much weight. The move signalled desperation on part of the centre, which, in the absence of political will to crack the whip on its coalition partner in the Omar Abdullah-led government in the state, was clearly clutching at straws in the wind. The team of interlocutors then has surprised not as much in its inefficacy, which was expected, but in its political impropriety.

Are these interlocutors speaking for the central government? If so, why isn’t the prime minister spelling out such significant policy shifts instead? If the answer is no, who are the interlocutors speaking for? In either case, then, the interlocutors have no business to issue such statements. There is of course a third possibility. If the idea was really to deflect attention from Omar Abdullah in the first place, the interlocutors seem to be doing handsomely. Else, it is time they stopped making policy announcements and got on with their limited job at hand.

Comments

 

Other News

Lok Sabha passes amendment bill to improve public examination system

The Lok Sabha on Wednesday passed the Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Amendment Bill, 2026 by a voice vote after an extensive discussion. Replying to the debate, minister of state (independent charge) for science & technology; earth sciences and MoS in the PMO, Dr. Jite

Shri Abhijit Phukon (IES, 2004) appointed as Joint Secretary, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare.

 Shri Abhijit Phukon (IES: 2004) has been appointed as Joint Secretary, Department of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India. His appointment, approved by the

Shri Avanish Kumar Mishra (ISS, 2000) appointed as Joint Secretary, Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances.

 Shri Avanish Kumar Mishra (ISS: 2000) has been appointed as Joint Secretary, Department of Administrative Reforms & Public Grievances (DARPG), Government of India. The appointment, approved by the Appointments

Millets are thriving. Are millet farmers?

The story of millets is nothing short of extraordinary. Once seen as the food of the poor and downtrodden, they are now seen as the food of the health conscious and the elite. Today, these nutri-cereals occupy prominent shelves in premium supermarkets, feature on the menus of gourmet restaurants, and are e

More judges will not fix courts without better court work practices

A vacant courtroom cannot decide a case. Neither can a poorly managed courtroom simply decide twice as many cases after receiving an additional judge. Judicial capacity and court productivity are related, but they are not the same. The distinction matters because India’s district and subord

Dharmendra Pradhan tenders resignation

Dharmendra Pradhan, education minister at the centre of the storm of the NEET paper leak, offered his resignation to the prime minister on Saturday.   He posted a two-page letter on X, saying he was pained by the events of the last ten days. "This is not a matter of personal

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter