Chorus of cacophony over national anthem

Politics behind the recurrent controversy over the national anthem is bereft of facts

pankaj-srivastava

Pankaj Srivastava | January 29, 2016 | New Delhi



 The debate on our national anthem, Jana Gana Mana, has started once again. Controversial BJP leader Subramanian Swamy in December wrote to prime minister Narendra Modi urging him to replace the wordings of the anthem with what Subhas Chandra Bose had incorporated in the Indian National Army anthem. According to Swamy, the national anthem was originally composed to praise the British king – words like ‘Bharata bhagya vidhata’ (the dispenser of India’s destiny) and ‘adhinayaka’ (the ruler) were for King George V, who had visited India in December 1911.


Earlier, in July 2015, Rajasthan governor Kalyan Singh had also questioned the meaning of the national anthem. While addressing students at a convocation of the Rajasthan University, he demanded the removal of ‘adhinayak’ since it ‘praises the English rule’ in India. “Jana gana mana adhinayaka jaya hey... ‘adhinayaka’ for whom? It praises ‘angreji shasak’, the British ruler. It should be amended and replaced by words ‘jana gana mana mangal gaye’,” he said.

But what is the reality? Did Rabindranath Tagore really praise the British ruler through Jana Gana Mana? Tagore himself made a clarification on this controversy. In a letter to Pulin Behari Sen on November 10, 1937, he wrote, “A certain high official in His Majesty’s service, who was also my friend, had requested that I write a song of felicitation towards the Emperor. The request simply amazed me. It caused a great stir in my heart. In response to that great mental turmoil, I pronounced the victory in Jana Gana Mana of that Bhagya Vidhata (God of Destiny) of India who has from age after age held steadfast the reins of India’s chariot through rise and fall, through the straight path and the curved. That Lord of Destiny, that Reader of the Collective Mind of India, that Perennial Guide, could never be George V, George VI, or any other George. Even my official friend understood this about the song. After all, even if his admiration for the crown was excessive, he was not lacking in simple common sense.”

Later, on March 13, 1939, Tagore once again wrote: “I should only insult myself if I cared to answer those who consider me capable of such unbounded stupidity as to sing in praise of George the Fourth or George the Fifth as the Eternal Charioteer leading the pilgrims on their journey through countless ages of the timeless history of mankind.”

Noble laureate Tagore was a great poet and while reading his full poem, all five stanzas (only the first stanza was adopted as the national anthem), with a little literary sense, one could easily understand how baseless the charges are. The third stanza of the poem is remarkable in this regard. In English translation, it reads, “The way of life is sombre as it moves through ups and downs, but we, the pilgrims, have followed it through ages. Oh! Eternal Charioteer, the wheels of your chariot echo day and night in the path In the midst of fierce revolution, your conch shell sounds. You save us from fear and misery. Oh! You who guide the people through torturous path, victory be to you, dispenser of the destiny of India! Victory, victory, victory to you!”

King George could have never been the eternal charioteer of India. So, how did this controversy arise? Actually, the composition was first sung during the Calcutta session of the Indian National Congress, inaugurated on December 26, 1911. The national anthem was sung on the second day of the convention. As welcoming King George V was in that day’s agenda, a section of the English press made the misinterpretation that Tagore wrote the song for the emperor. The next day, on December 28, The Statesman reported: “The Bengali poet Rabindranath Tagore sang a song composed by him specially to welcome the Emperor.” No doubt, a song was sung in praise of the emperor but that was not Jana Gana Mana. It was ‘badshah humara’ written in Hindi by Rambhuj Chaudhary. Amrita Bazar Patrika stated the order of events clearly. On December 28, 1911, it reported: “The proceedings of the Congress party session started with a prayer in Bengali to praise God (song of benediction). This was followed by a resolution expressing loyalty to King George V. Then another song was sung welcoming King George V.”

The annual session report of the Indian National Congress of December 1911 too is clear on this account: “On the first day of 28th annual session of the Congress, proceedings started after singing Vande Mataram. On the second day the work began after singing a patriotic song by Babu Ravindranath Tagore. Messages from well wishers were then read and a resolution was passed expressing loyalty to King George V. Afterwards the song composed for welcoming King George V and Queen Mary was sung.”

Yet, there was a controversy when it came to making a choice of the national anthem. Right-wingers were in favour of ‘Vande Mataram’ written by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee, and many Muslim leaders raised serious objections. They perceive this song as a hymn to Goddess Durga which was unacceptable to them, whereas ‘Jana Gana Mana’ was acceptable to all. Tagore had written it in Sanskritised Bengali but most of the words of the song could be found in all major languages in India. While singing the song, one could easily visualise the map of India. And people of that time had no doubt about Tagore’s integrity and they knew the poetic meaning of ‘adhinayaka’ as well. 

The founding fathers of our nation were wise enough to avoid any controversy on this issue. The resolution regarding the national anthem had never been placed in the constituent assembly. On November 26, 1949, the assembly adopted the constitution without the national anthem. On January 24, 1950, the constituent assembly met again and its president Dr Rajendra Prasad made a statement, after which ‘Jana Gana Mana’ became the national anthem and ‘Vande Mataram’ was given an equal status.

However, the attacks on ‘Jana Gana Mana’ have never stopped. The right-wing politics has always put ‘Vande Mataram’ above ‘Jana gana mana’. Objections from the Muslim community have always given the Hindu right-wing a chance to portray them as less patriotic. Because of such propaganda, many people now believe that ‘adhinayaka’ in the national anthem is none other than the British emperor. 
 
In his letter to Pulin Behari Sen, Tagore had raised the question about the ‘common sense’ among the people indulged in the controversy. Nowadays too, the common sense becomes most uncommon when a political agenda lies behind. n

feedback@governancenow.com 

(The column appears in the January 16-31, 2016 issue)

Comments

 

Other News

Mumbai`s stalled building projects: Is self-redevelopment the real solution?

Land in Mumbai city, which is surrounded by water on three sides, is scarce and has a premium. Property prices in certain areas of financial capital of the country are as much as Rs 1 lakh per sq ft. Yet, 5,800 buildings have been lying in a stalled condition for the last 18 years. Meanwhile

Revadi, electoral reforms and fiscal responsibility

Revadi (sweetmeat) or more popular word, ‘freebies’, has been dominating headlines recently. A public interest litigation (PIL) has been filed in Supreme Court to bar all political parties from making such promises. In response, one leading political party, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has filed thei

Jal Jeevan Mission: 6.70 crore households provided with tap water connections

Since August 2019, Government of India, in partnership with States, is implementing Jal Jeevan Mission (JJM) to make provision of potable tap water supply every rural household by 2024. As many as 6.70 crore households have been provided with tap water connections in the 35 months, since Aug

Cloud inclusivity: Ensuring highly regulated organisations are ready for a cloud-first world

Over the last few years, cloud has been able to create a special place for itself amongst fast moving, competitive and growth-led organisations. As the technology became an imperative, it has undoubtedly created unique business opportunities and isbecoming an anchor for innovation for leading businesses gl

1.29 crore voters chose NOTA in five years

None-of-the-above, or NOTA – the option introduced for voters in 2013 when they don’t want to support any of the candidate – has made some progress. In the past five years, NOTA has secured 1,29,77,627 votes in state assembly elections and Lok Sabha election, according to an analysis by t

India committs to reduce Emissions Intensity of GDP by 45% by 2030

India stands committed to reduce Emissions Intensity of its GDP by 45 percent from the 2005 level by 2030 and achieve about 50 percent cumulative electric power installed capacity from non-fossil fuel-based energy resources by 2030. The country’s India’s updated Nationally Determined Contributi

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook    Twitter    Google Plus    Linkedin    Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter