Are corporate interests more important than citizens' welfare for our governments?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | June 10, 2010



Close on the heels of the tragic Bhopal gas leak verdict has come the revelation that the Centre dropped a key clause in the Nuclear Liability Bill to benefit suppliers who could have been held accountable for wilful negligence. The move reportedly came after American suppliers mounted pressure to get deleted section 17 (b) which said that suppliers could be sued for a nuclear accident resulting from wilful act or gross negligence on their part.

Amidst a raging debate over the woefully inadequate compensation to victims and sentence to perpetrators of the Bhopal tragedy, the Centre's move appears to be yet another case of our governments batting for corporates even at the cost of national interest. The furore over capping the liability at Rs 500 crore clearly did not deter the government from tinkering with the controversial Bill further.

If Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has much to explain about going out of his way to guard interests of American suppliers, so does Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit about backing the power distribution companies that have been found guilty of fudging information about their financial health. Even as Delhi's power regulator has found that the three power distribution companies clocked a profit of around Rs 1,000 crore last fiscal, the chief minister continues to plead for slapping a hike in tariff on the hapless consumers. Only now she is arguing for an uninterrupted power supply instead of her earlier stance of helping the distribution companies bridge their losses.

The larger question, therefore, arises whether corporate interests are more important than citizens' welfare for our governments.

 

Comments

 

Other News

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.”   No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP

Labour law in India: A decade of transition

The story of labour law in India is not just about laws and codes, but also about how the nation has continued to negotiate the position of the workforce within its economic framework. The implementation of the Labour Codes across the country in November 2025 marks a definitive endpoint in the process. Yet


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter