Should Planning Commission dictate chief ministers?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | May 18, 2010



The Planning Commission has reportedly refused to finalise Centre’s annual allocation to Uttar Pradesh unless the state chief minister Mayawati attends the meeting called for the purpose. Hindustan Times has reported that the Planning Commission has decided to hold back funds to the states in all cases where the chief ministers do not attend the meetings called by the Planning Commission Deputy Chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia.

While chief ministers routinely attend such meetings, Mayawati has not attended a single such meeting ever since she took over as chief minister. For the past three years, the annual plan for Uttar Pradesh has been finalised in her absence, in meetings chaired by the Planning Commission’s member in-charge for Uttar Pradesh and attended by the secretaries of the state. Mayawati doesn’t just skip the meetings called by Ahluwalia, though. She refuses to turn up at meetings called by the prime minister, too.

Of course, Mayawati is doing a disservice to Uttar Pradesh by not lobbying for her state in person. Her political equation with the central government notwithstanding, she should be seen to be serving the interests of her electorate by garnering as much as she can from the Centre.

On the other hand, however, the Planning Commission has no business to demand the presence of the chief ministers. It is an extra-constitutional relic of a bygone era that is scarcely in sync with either contemporary economic requirements or federal democratic aspirations. It is neither accountable to Parliament nor guided by the will of the people.

Should the Planning Commission, then, dictate chief ministers?

Comments

 

Other News

RBI pauses to assess inflation risks, policy transmission

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has begun the new fiscal year with a calibrated pause, keeping the repo rate unchanged at 5.25 per cent in its April Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting. The decision, taken unanimously, reflects a shift from aggressive policy action to cautious observation after a signi

New pathways for tourism growth

Traditionally, India’s tourism policy has been based on three main components: the number of visitors, building tourist attractions and providing facilities for tourists. Due to the increase in climate-related issues and environmental destruction that occurred over previous years, policymakers have b

Is the US a superpower anymore?

On April 8, hours after warning that “a whole civilisation will die tonight,” US president Donald Trump, exhibiting his unique style of retreating from high-voltage brinkmanship, announced that he agreed to a two-week ceasefire with Iran. The weekend talks in Islamabad have failed and the futur

Machines communicate, humans connect

There is a moment every event professional knows—the kind that arrives without warning, usually an hour before the curtain rises. Months of meticulous planning are in place. And then comes the call: “We’ll also need a projector. For the slides.”   No email

Why India is entering a ‘stagflation lite’ phase

India’s macroeconomic narrative is quietly shifting—from a rare “Goldilocks” equilibrium of stable growth and contained inflation to a more fragile phase where external shocks are beginning to dominate domestic policy outcomes. The numbers still look reassuring at first glance: GDP

Labour law in India: A decade of transition

The story of labour law in India is not just about laws and codes, but also about how the nation has continued to negotiate the position of the workforce within its economic framework. The implementation of the Labour Codes across the country in November 2025 marks a definitive endpoint in the process. Yet


Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter