Shouldn't the demand for Anderson's extradition have come from India?

ashishs

Ashish Sharma | June 9, 2010



“A sentence of merely two years for those responsible for the world's worst chemical disaster is outrageous. All those responsible for this disaster, including Warren Anderson, former chairman of Union Carbide, should stand trial in India and receive punishment that reflects the devastation and pain they have caused for thousands of people.... Warren Anderson absolutely deserves to be extradited from the US and punished for the full extent of his crimes.”

Despite all the sound and fury over the tragic verdict that came more than 25 years after the Bhopal gas leak, the demand for Anderson's extradition quoted above did not emanate from the Indian government. Neither it did from the principal Opposition. Yes, Indian politicians did sense the public mood well enough to join the chorus and slam the verdict in television studios.

But it took a US Congressman, Frank Pallone, Jr to demand Anderson's extradition and best articulate the pain and outrage at the sentence that only added insult to the injury inflicted by the compensation handed out earlier.

The question therefore arises whether the Indian government, failing which, the Opposition, shouldn't have demanded Anderson's extradition. Why did both the Congress party and the Bharatiya Janata Party stop well short of making this specific demand? Again, would the Left parties have bothered to do so if Anderson had not been an American and had been a Chinese national, for example?       

Comments

 

Other News

Before India voted, the framers worried about the referee

“We are making a Constitution forever and not only for today.” Shibban Lal Saksena said this in the Constituent Assembly on June 15, 1949. He was warning that a ruling party might one day choose a loyalist to run India’s elections. Seventy-seven years later, the Supreme Court is wrestli

Delhi moves to real-time traffic management

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), chaired by prime minister Narendra Modi, has approved implementation of the ITMS Project by Delhi Police at an estimated cost of Rs.1,789.52 crore, inclusive of taxes. The project will cover 42 identified traffic corridors and will be implemented in three

MDR on UPI: Can sustainability come without weakening the network?

The extraordinary transaction volumes and value (₹29.82 Lakh crore in August 2026 alone) of the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) have made it not only an Indian success story, but a global one. In 2024, UPI accounted for nearly 49% of the world’s real-time payment transaction volume, with more th

The Xi-Trump summit: The unending rivalry

Diplomacy is akin to an art, wherein the summitry, conflict resolution and negotiations form apt constituents of the entire context of deal making and “playing for keeps” in the international arena. The Xi-Trump summit in Washington last week, in which the American president broke all conside

“Indians, yet treated like outsiders”

Moving to Delhi-NCR for education can be an exciting experience for students from Northeast India. It gives us a chance to meet new people, experience a different culture and become more independent. But living away from home also comes with challenges that people who have not experienced them may not al

Import duty on major edible oils cut

The government has reduced the Basic Customs Duty (BCD) on major imported crude edible oils with a view to moderating domestic edible oil prices, providing relief to consumers and mitigating inflationary pressures arising from the sharp increase in international edible oil prices.  

Upcoming Conferences



-->

Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter