Devgan vs SRK: how the legal stakes are piled

Is Ajay Devgan right in taking Yash Raj Films to CCI for abuse of dominance?

manojkumarhs

Manoj Kumar | November 2, 2012


Ajay Devgan
Ajay Devgan

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) will once again look into alleged anti-competitive practices in the Indian film industry.

Ajay Devgan Films (ADF) has alleged misuse of dominant position by Yash Raj Films (YRF) in the Bollywood film market segment to deny ADF free market access for release of their latest films ‘Son of Sardar’ during the coming Diwali festival.

Vide a notice filed on October 18, 2012, ADF alleged that YRF had made exhibitors agree to monopolistic pre-conditions at the time of release of its last film ‘Ek Tha Tiger’ that such exhibitors would give preference and priority to YRF’s Diwali release over others.

Bollywood film market is not new to allegations of or attempted abuse of dominance and monopolistic behaviour.

On an earlier occasion, CCI had to intervene in July 2009 by initiating a cartel investigation against Bollywood film producers and distributors on a plea by multiplex companies alleging anti-competitive practices and cartelization and misuse of dominance in film distributions & revenue sharing amongst Bollywood film produces, distributors and multiplex owners.

The CCI had then pointed out that Bollywood producers and distributors could not have arrangements which violated free market environment for multiplex owners and had imposed fine in the region of 10% of revenues on the producers and distributors.

With the intervention of CCI, a nearly two-month logjam and strike of multiplexes came to an end after costing the film industry nearly Rs. 300 crores plus in losses.

Having received tutorials from CCI, why is the ugly face of anti-competitive practices, monopolistic practice and abuse of dominance coming to the fore again and who is impacted by these practices:

Consumer/Cinema Viewer:
A consumer, in this case a cinema viewer, is denied free access all available movies released by the film industry as movies of only dominant producers is screened at multiplexes and other movies do not get screened or get screened much later. 

Competing Bollywood Film Producers:
Competing Bollywood film producers are not able to get free access to the cinema Viewer market and to exhibitors/multiplexes thereby putting them to disadvantage and making there cinema projects unviable.

Competing Bollywood Financiers, Actors & Advertisers:
Competing Bollywood financiers, actors & advertisers are not able to get free access to the cinema viewer market and to exhibitors/multiplexes thereby putting them to disadvantage and making there cinema projects and investments unviable.

Bollywood Cinema has always been identified with blockbuster movies from old production houses like Yash Raj Films, Ramesh Sippy, Karan Johar etc to name a few.

While there is no denying that the reputation of these production houses is a result of hard work and their performance over the years, or in most cases, over decades – it would be wise to note that as long as the performance of their movies is based of the content of the cinema or even advertising in the free market space, their could hardly be any issues. 

This scale of success and acceptance by cinema viewers obviously does not seem to satisfy some Bollywood producers if allegation of anti-competitive practices as discussed above are believed to have any merit. 

The purported onset of monopolistic arrangements to acquire advantage over competitors and also thus denying free market and free access to competitors, stakeholders and cinema viewers, has led to issues of these anti-competitive practices being raised and looked into by the CCI.

Hollywood has also had its share of allegation of anti-competitive practices and its consequential impact of stakeholders and the industry, which have led to rulings on the issue from courts as follows. 

In a 1946 ruling of RKO Radio Pictures, the United States Supreme Court held an arrangement  to be anti-competitive (anti-trust laws as known in the USA) wherein  a movie was distributed only among   multiplexes owned by parties to this arrangement who were then able to exclusively show those movies during a certain ‘first run’ period before  other multiplexes screen the same movie. 

Subsequently, in 1948, the United States Supreme Court passed the landmark Hollywood Anti-trust case ruling that changed the future of working of the Hollywood Film producers also owning their own multiplexes and retained exclusive rights as to which multiplex  would show their films and which would not. The 1948 ruling held that such monopolistic practices were in violation to competition (anti-trust laws as known in the USA) which did not allow such exclusive arrangements. This landmark ruling  changed the way cinema production, distribution and exhibition was done in Hollywood permanently.

The lessons from Hollywood however seem to be mixed from the industry impact perspective. Skeptics say that competitiveness in the post 1948 judgment era did not increase the quality of movies  but only resulted in the industry being on the edge of viability for the next 16-17 years. The positive outcome of course was the emergence of a new breed to producers bringing in fresh shots of creativity over the years, which is still continuing.

In India, as consumers, cinema viewers have precious little to get from the CCI for violation of their rights of free choice by anti-competitive arrangements, but all stakeholders look up to CCI to correct any encroachments on the free market and free choice space, which is the in-evitable way forward  in the long run.

The author is a corporate law expert and managing partner of Hammurabi & Solomon. He can be reached at [email protected]

Comments

 

Other News

NSE ranks 4th globally in IPO fundraising

The National Stock Exchange of India (NSE) has emerged as the fourth largest exchange in the world in terms of IPO fundraising during the first half of calendar year 2025 (H1CY25), according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. Between January and June 2025, the NSE raised $5.51

On World Youth Skills Day, let’s ask: What will it take to retain Gen Z?

On World Youth Skills Day, observed every year on July 15, we’re reminded that the future of any economy depends on how well it invests in its youth. In India, where over half the population is under 30, the question of youth skills is not just about employment, it’s about meaning, wellbeing, a

Modi’s Ghana, Namibia visit a transformative chapter in India-Africa ties

Prime minister Narendra Modi last week completed a visit to five countries of Global South: Ghana, Trinidad & Tobago, Argentina, Brazil and Namibia. The objective was to reignite old existing partnerships and to project India’s leadership and influence in the Global South community. 

MoEFCC and CAQM launch ‘The Breath of Change’

To tackle air pollution in Delhi-NCR through public participation and creative engagement, the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM) have jointly launched a strategic communication campaign titled The Breath of Change.

India well on way to becoming a global IP powerhouse

Intellectual Property (IP) has evolved into a critical component of innovation and global competitiveness in India’s economy. As businesses pivot toward intangible assets like data, algorithms and branding, IP protection is no longer a matter of formality—it is a strategic imperative. The last

War and Peace: The conundrum of conflict in West Asia

Israel and Palestine have been the harbinger of troubles for the last 80-odd years. It is an unending and persistent saga of conflict and attrition which has bloodied the political, societal and economic turf in West Asia for long. The scale of wars, which were more than skirmishes of the day, ranged from

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now





Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter