Mamata wants a CBI against judges

On the sly, is the ruling class conspiring to subvert the constitution?

manojkumarhs

Manoj Kumar | August 17, 2012



Why does Mamata Banerjee want to say it a thousand times that favourable verdicts are given in return for money. The Calcutta high court has admitted a contempt plea to make her see reason. Question is why is Mamata so keen on taking on the judiciary and why now?

The central government is working overtime to have the Judicial Standards & Accountability Bill, 2010 (“judicial accountability law”) passed to make judicial accountability enforceable.

On the independence day, the chief justice of India (CJI) cautioned the central government not to show undue haste in pushing the judicial accountability law.

Currently, the Restatement of Values of Judicial Life adopted by full court meeting of the supreme court in 1997 provides the guidelines to the supreme court and high court judges in conducting their functions.

The statement of objects explains that any conduct by a judge which lacks demonstrable integrity and dignity would undermine the trust reposed in judiciary under the constitution, hence should be subject to accountability and oversight.

The following judicial standards have been set out in the accountability law:

1. Norms, including punctuality and commitment to work, guidelines and conventions essential for the conduct and behaviour of judges, being prerequisite for an independent, strong and respected judiciary, having integrity and detachment and impartial administration of justice as reflected in the Restatement of Values already adopted by the conference of chief justices held in 1999 shall be practised by every judge.

2. All times be conscious that he is under the public gaze and not do any act or omission which is unbecoming of the high office he occupies and the public esteem in which that office is held.

3. A degree of aloofness consistent with the dignity of his office shall be practised by every judge.

4. Judgments should speak for themselves.

The judicial accountability law seeks to set up a National Judicial Oversight Committee (NJOC) comprising of:

- a retired CJI as its chairman,
- a judge of the supreme court nominated by the CJI,
- a chief justice of a high court nominated by the CJI,
- attorney general of India,
- an eminent person nominated by the president of India.

The central government has control on the NJOC since majority of the members are nominees/officers of the central government.

Additionally, the central government has powers to appoint an advocate to conduct cases against a judge.

The central government will further frame rules regarding the form and manner in which a complaint against a judge is to be made and the form for disclosure of assets and liability statements by judges.

The trappings of the judicial accountability law almost look like an attempt to create a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) by a different name, specially dedicated for working on judges.

The intent and purpose of the judicial accountability law, i.e., to lay down judicial standards and provide accountability, establish credible and expedient mechanism for investigating complaints of misbehaviour or incapacity of judges of the supreme court and high courts – has been completely lost sight of in the drafting of the Law.

The government of the days seems to have forgotten that the Central Government is also a litigant before the very Judge whom it seeks to oversee through the NJOC. Credibility of the NJOC is very suspect, given the growing intolerance of the central government to adverse orders by higher judiciary.

CBI remains as a stick in the hands of the central government against adversaries – is the judicial accountability law now seeking to arm the central government with a similar stick against judges.

Can we trust the ruling class (read Mamata) not to try misuse NJOC against a judge who dares to admit a contempt plea against it (read her) or for that matter is this an indicator of how the central government would want to handle a stand-off with the higher judiciary in times to come?

Comments

 

Other News

Maharashtra Aggregator Cabs Policy flawed: IFAT

On May 21, 2025, Maharashtra issued a government resolution (GR) on its Aggregator Cabs Policy 2025 to formalize the largely unregulated sector. The guidelines outline the framework on ride cancellations, surge pricing, driver earnings, among others for app based services like Ola, Uber. Now, the Indian Fe

The Northeast the most diverse region of our diverse nation: PM

Prime minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the Rising North East Investors Summit 2025 at Bharat Mandapam, New Delhi on Friday. Welcoming the dignitaries to the event, the PM expressed pride, warmth, and immense confidence in the future of the North East region. He recalled the recent Ashtalakshmi Mahot

MMRDA proposes formation of Fare Fixation Committee for Metro Lines 2A & 7

Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has proposed the constitution of a Fare Fixation Committee (FFC) for Mumbai Metro Lines 2A and 7, currently operated by Maha Mumbai Metro Operation Corporation Limited (MMMOCL). ‘Fare Fixation’ is mandated under Section 33

‘Op Sindoor not an act of revenge, but a new form of justice’

Emphasizing that Operation Sindoor was not an act of revenge, but a new form of justice, prime minister Narendra Modi on Thursday remarked that it was not just an expression of outrage but a display of India`s unwavering strength and determination. He asserted that the nation has adopted a bold approach, s

An ode to the enduring legacy of India’s temple culture

Dynasties of Devotion: The Secrets of 7 Iconic Hindu Temples By Deepa Mandlik (Translated from the Marathi by Aboli Mandlik) HarperCollins, 232 pages, Rs 399

How to improve India’s crèche system

India stands at a pivotal moment, caught between the promise of a demographic dividend and the crisis of gender inequality. While falling fertility rates, rising female education, and increasing labour force participation signal progress, policymakers continue to neglect one of the most invisible yet vital

Visionary Talk: Amitabh Gupta, Pune Police Commissioner with Kailashnath Adhikari, MD, Governance Now



Archives

Current Issue

Opinion

Facebook Twitter Google Plus Linkedin Subscribe Newsletter

Twitter